The West Branch Drug & Alcohol Abuse Commission
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 236616299
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Williamsport, PA, USA
- Phone
- 5703238543
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alcohol, Drug Abuse, Prevention Only
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $6,934,836
- Expenses
- $6,509,600
- Assets
- $2,538,827
- Liabilities
- $787,488
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SHEA MADDEN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- SHEA MADDEN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $160,708 total reported compensation
- MICHAEL W REEDER (CHIEF FISCAL OFFICER): $116,123 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
West branch drug and alcohol abuse commission (the "commission") provides funding for qualified individuals who are afflicted with alcohol and other drug issues. Continued on schedule o.the commission provides case management services, intensive care management services, and prevention/intervention services. The commission contracts with licensed treatment providers across the commonwealth of Pennsylvania for a full continuum of care, including outpatient, intensive outpatient, detox, rehabilitation, and halfway houses.
What it reported doing in 2024
State opioid response (sor) funds were utilized to provide housing for individuals in need of a stable place from which to recover. There were 115 applicants who benefited, along with their families, at a total cost of $241,234. A part-time case manager is focused largely on providing community-based support to the recipients of these funds. An additional part-time case manager was hired who possesses a wealth of experience and helps to facilitate inpatient admission for those who have particular difficulty accessing care due to specific needs.the commission was awarded the pa department of drug & alcohol programs' sor (rrh) grant to serve as the recovery hub for region 8 beginning july 1, 2023. A total of $363,000 was awarded for july 1, 2024, through june 30, 2025. In service to the 12-county north central pa region, these funds support the work of the commission's recovery services supervisor as the recovery hub coordinator, a contracted consultant, and administrative support from the commission. Funds were also expended for outreach, training, travel, and rental space for the provision of training. Recovery hub activities included provision of targeted training to crs staff throughout the region, technical assistance to individuals interested in and/or providing recovery community organization or licensed recovery housing services, and facilitation of local communities in the development and execution of recovery symposia in locations throughout the region. All hub efforts are designed to build and empower community-based recovery and resources.arpa supplemental, through block grant funds, continued to support prevention, case management services, and recovery support. These funds were used for sustainability of positions originally provided by expansion dollars and allowed staff to follow client progress more closely including additional support during inpatient treatment stays. It also helped support community-based case management for recipients of housing assistance funds and a part-time case manager to specialize in difficult inpatient placements.certified recovery specialist (crs) staff are on-call 24/7/365 to present at the emergency department or via telehealth to meet with overdose survivors or anyone affected by substance use to engage and to facilitate agreed upon services. Such services include inpatient treatment via a case manager, outpatient services, medication assisted treatment and/or crs follow-up services. The service is provided by commission staff with hospitals, a local ems provider, and a local police department.the commission also disseminated 1,701 naloxone kits as a recognized entity and via community distribution events in lycoming and clinton counties. Naloxboxes (units with naloxone, cpr mask and instruction manual for response to opioid overdose) were monitored and replenished in 47 community locations in clinton county and 71 community locations in lycoming county. Ready access to these has the potential to save countless lives and provide an opportunity to engage in recovery.in may 2023, the commission secured a 3-year $300,000 health choices/community care grant to start a behavioral health home plus (bhhp) program. In recognition of the many ways in which physical health and behavioral health are intricately intertwined, this has allowed for a greater wholistic focus on serving individuals' total wellness, including, among many things, nicotine cessation services and communicable disease screening and treatment as they relate to substance use disorders. These funds were expended in full in fiscal year 2024/2025, and services are now sustained by billing the behavioral health managed care organization for services rendered to eligible members.the commission has a memorandum of understanding with lycoming and clinton counties to oversee the Pennsylvania opioid litigation settlement funds. The commission, in compliance with the mou's core strategies and approved uses, has utilized these fund
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 94% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 76
- Transparency & Controls: 65
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 40
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 83.7%; rating input score 84
- Program expense ratio: 89.2%; rating input score 89
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 6.1%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.39; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.31; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.3%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.2% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.1% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.4% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 83.7% of revenue deployed · 89.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $5.8M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $161K · 10 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $848K reported
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 13/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 54/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Whistleblower policy not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 33/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 59/100.