The Wende Museum of the Cold War Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
160470118
IRS 990 coverage
2019–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Culver City, CA, USA
Phone
3102161600
Rating
74
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Museum, Museum Activities

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$5,573,945
Expenses
$5,269,229
Assets
$86,644,097
Liabilities
$1,109,634

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

20 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JUSTINIAN JAMPOL PHD (PRESIDENT & EXECUTIVE DIRE)

Highest reported compensation

  • JUSTINIAN JAMPOL PHD (PRESIDENT & EXECUTIVE DIRE): $453,954 total reported compensation
  • CARA N LEWIS (DEPUTY DIRECTOR): $194,434 total reported compensation
  • JOESKE SEGAL (CHIEF CURATOR & DIR OF PR): $123,130 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

See schedule o

What it reported doing in 2024

Community programs: public access: the wende museum offers free public access to its galleries and gardens on fridays, saturdays, and sundays from 10 a.m. To 5 p.m., and mondays through thursdays by appointment. The museum welcomes approximately 19,000 visitors per year. The wende also provides free global access to art and artifacts through its online collections, and hosts an array of online events attended by people around the world.education programs offered in fiscal year 2025:- voices of defiance: soviet jewry and the refuseniks (symposium, archives open house, film screening)- polish archives open house- critical media literacy workshops- intergenerational writing workshops- bumdog school of film workshops- camp gesher program - soviet jewish archives- zine fest / personal artifact zine program- otis college true stories interviews and presentations- eisner intergenerational big band performance- summer camp at the stevie (watercolor, plant weaving, natural dye)- a professional development fellowship program for underserved youth- school field trips- arts workshops- family day activities- the wende teen council- development of curriculum based on the russian-speaking jewry archivesthe museum also trained 9 college and university interns in museum skills: 6 collections interns, 2 curatorial interns, and 1 education intern.community engagement: the wende prioritizes community wellness and community engagement as core to the museum's mission. Community engagement activities include:- intergenerational art activities taught by museum staff or teaching artists- an annual gathering of culver city nonprofits at the wende, culminating in the presentation of the wende nonprofit transformation prize to a local nonprofit that is innovatively serving the community- wellness offerings such as a weekly mindfulness meditation class, intergenerational prompt-based writing classes, movement classes, and yoga- public digitization days when visitors can bring in their own items to photograph or scan using the wende's equipment- partnership programs with numerous local nonprofit organizations- the wende presented dozens of other free public programs in fy2025, such as live music, dance performances, panel discussions, and artist talks.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 74% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 66
  • Transparency & Controls: 74
  • Accountability: 87
  • Sustainability: 64
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 74.5%; rating input score 75
  • Program expense ratio: 66.9%; rating input score 67
  • Fundraising efficiency: $5.26 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 94.4%; rating input score 94; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 5.5%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 16.44; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 14.6%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 14.3% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 23.8% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 34% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 74.5% of revenue deployed · 66.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 17 of 18 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $3.5M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $454K · 20 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $5.4M reported
  • Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 18/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 52/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 19/100.