The Weekapaug Foundation for Conservation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
223018145
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Westerly, RI, USA
Phone
4013155380
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Land Resources Conservation

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$471,871
Expenses
$254,197
Assets
$20,310,880
Liabilities
$2,251

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

People named in this filing

  • ROBERT R BOUVIER (TRUSTEE)
  • MOLLY BYRNES-RANDALL (TRUSTEE)
  • DONALD DILLON (TRUSTEE)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The weekapaug foundation for conservation preserves the natural environment in our local pond communities. Accomplishments include preserving open space, protecting the barrier beaches, encouraging community engagement, and ensuring the integrity and water quality of the ponds themselves.

What it reported doing in 2024

During 2024 the weekapaug foundation for conservation worked to preserve the natural environment in our local pond communities. Our accomplishments include preserving and protecting open space, restoring our local barrier beaches, and working to ensure a healthy ecosystem in and around our ponds. During 2024, the foundation's activities included stewardship of the various properties in our conservation portfolio of fee-owned lands and conservation easement holdings. One new stewardship activity included working with volunteers to build over one hundred linear feet of much needed "bog bridges" for the trails at our noyes neck preserve. We connected our trail to a trail created by another land preserve creating the only pedestrian connection between the weekapaug and haversham communities. The new boardwalks create a more inviting and accessible path through the wooded area between our two communities. In addition to the noyes neck - haversham trail improvements, this area saw ongoing maintenance of its stone walls and further upgrades to the community and pollinator gardens. We continued our work on the fen, with professional guidance, for the continued removal of invasive species from this environmentally sensitive area. We included the community in informational meetings to learn more about the delicate process. The foundation was excited to receive a grant for the installation of three osprey nests on one of our properties. The process of permitting, construction and installation of those structures was well underway by end of the year. Throughout the course of 2024, the foundation continued to renew its community presence by generously funding its dumouchel and hoffman scholarships for the support of environmental studies students at the university of Rhode Island.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 73% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and liabilities are high compared with assets.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 68
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 76
  • Sustainability: 87
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 72.9%; rating input score 73
  • Program expense ratio: 80.8%; rating input score 81
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 46.1%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 79.9; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.7% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1.7% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 72.9% of revenue deployed · 80.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $205K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
  • Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 59/100.