The Warrior Connection Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 300653682
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2018–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2020, Form 990-T 2022, Form 990-N 2015
- Location
- Grapevine, TX, USA
- Phone
- 8025793863
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Military, Veterans' Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $167,777
- Expenses
- $414,224
- Assets
- $77,567
- Liabilities
- $311,416
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- Elizabeth Fields (Executive Dir.): $34,942 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Warrior Connection strives to end Veteran Suicide and repair family relationships through proven holistic residential retreats that specialize in Post Traumatic Stress (PTS) and Military Sexual Trauma (MST). With unwavering support, we are dedicated to healing the invisible wounds of our nations Veterans.
What it reported doing in 2022
The unprecedented global pandemic led our nation into an increased state of trauma, loss, and grief. In 2021 and 2022, TWC programs staff balanced the needs of those requesting our services and safe implementation of in-person operations. Our staff and volunteers did precisely what you would expect, devised ways to meet the CDC protocols, and continued to offer critical services withnew and innovative ideas. TWC offered a full program schedule in 2022, running a full complement of programs for all three of our target audiences - maleVeterans, female Veterans, and Military Spouses. Additionally, TWC conducted mentor and facilitator training, paving the way for 2023. Upon returning to in-person activities, TWC began to see trends with those relatively unscathed by personal illness or financial hardship due to the pandemic. However, a continued loss of connectivity and treasured experiences weighed heavy on the hearts of many we served, especially with those already coping with PTS, MST, depression, and anxiety producing isolation. TWC saw these losses firsthand as participants reported higher rates of significant mental health struggles and substance abuse-related issues. In 2022, we also so a very large increase in our waiting list for female veterans struggling with Military Sexual Trauma (MST). As one of only three non-profit service organize specializing in MST, we plan to increase our offerings to female veterans in the years ahead.In addition to running our programs face-to-face, TWC continued to embrace virtual platforms with military personnel, Veterans, and other essential front-line workers, business leaders, and corporate partners by sharing our wellness philosophy and the science of Post Traumatic Growth. As friends of our work, you know that TWC ascribes to a philosophy of "what doesn't kill us will make us stronger." This philosophy suggests that when times are tough, we take the time to explore ourselves, find meaning in our trauma, and reframe negative experiences such that we become better versions of ourselves. This is the basic definition of Post Traumatic Growth, and a view of trauma TWC embraces wholeheartedly. Additionally, TWC folded virtual "meet-upsX and group reunions into our regular retreat follow-up routines using virtual tools.Finally, TWC hired a new chief executive in September of 2022. Elizabeth Fields has a wealth of nonprofit fundraising and marketing experience and cares deeply about veterans. This is a major investment in TWCs future which, combined with our access to a life -saving SBA EIDL loan package in 2020 and 2021, has allowed the organization to weather the pandemic and ensuing national financial downturn.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 95% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 88
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 79
- Sustainability: 7
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 86.6%; rating input score 87
- Fundraising efficiency: $8.56 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -146.9%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.19; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 4.01; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.4%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 21.1% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.8% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 13.9% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 86.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $359K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $35K · 14 people listed
- Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2018 to 2022
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 33/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 9/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 32/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.