Lincoln Center Theater
Legal name: The Vivian Beaumont Theaterinc D/b/a Lincoln Center Theater
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 133004747
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- New York, NY, US
- Phone
- (212) 501-3213
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Arts, Culture, and Humanities
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $71,294,644
- Expenses
- $58,791,090
- Assets
- $179,176,072
- Liabilities
- $7,441,799
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
68 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DAVID F SOLOMON (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- ANDRE S BISHOP TO 63025 (PRODUCING ARTISTIC DIRECTO): $984,502 total reported compensation
- ADAM SIEGEL (MANAGING DIRECTOR): $549,502 total reported compensation
- NAOMI GRABEL (EXEC. DIR. DEVEL. & PLANNI): $480,610 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Lincoln Center Theater is committed to bringing exceptional theater to life. Through premieres of new work and revivals of classics, we strive to foster access to theatergoers and to the community at large. Our programming and educational initiatives introduce new audiences to the excitement and value of live theater.
What it reported doing in 2024
Marketing, education & outreachthe education and community engagement department works with thousands of new yorkers each year in schools and in their communities, as well as at lincoln center theater (lct). Our education programs connect the artistry on our stages to New York city public schools in partnerships that support creative teaching and imaginative student learning through theater. Our community engagement programs use theater as a tool to spark curiosity, foster compassion, and empower our communities. Lct has five main education initiatives that serve both students and teachers in New York city's public middle and high schools. The high school program provides in-school workshops conducted by teaching artists as well as free tickets for our productions. The shakespeare program provides students with an introduction to the playwright by approaching his language as actors. The lead (learning english and drama) project helps multilingual learners improve their english-language speaking skills by utilizing theater techniques. The songwriting in schools program brings professional lyricists and composers into classrooms to teach students how to write songs from a character's point of view. After-school initiatives include performance projects and professional mentorship opportunities. Lct's education programs reach a total of approximately 4,700 students and 80 teachers each year. Lct's community engagement programs invite people into our building to find community and tap into their creativity through programming in our public spaces. We also support municipal residencies, which bring teaching artists into communities across nyc to engage in storytelling, play, and creative exploration with people of all ages and backgrounds. The theater's membership program is an audience development program servicing approximately 20,000 lincoln center theater members, each of whom, after payment of an annual fee, is entitled to purchase one ticket to each of the theater's productions at a substantial discount (subject in some circumstances to availability) and to receive special information and service in the ordering of tickets. Over 45,000 younger members, under the linctix program, are entitled to membership benefits and discounts without the payment of an annual fee.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 83
- Transparency & Controls: 83
- Accountability: 99
- Sustainability: 73
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 94.3%; rating input score 94
- Program expense ratio: 85.2%; rating input score 85
- Fundraising efficiency: $5.75 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 6 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 98%; rating input score 98; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 17.5%; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.05; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.8%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.3% per year; rating input score 100; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0.7% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0.7% per year; rating input score 100; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 94.3% of revenue deployed · 85.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 49 of 50 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $50.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $985K · 68 people listed · 6 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $989K reported
- Consistency: 42 of 42 current checks pass
- Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 14 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 25/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.