The Vitamin D Alliance Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
263402548
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2014
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2014
Location
Jackson, MI, USA
Phone
5177879481
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Reported finances

Expenses
$48,900
Assets
$4,451

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

People named in this filing

  • JAMES OLIVER (PRES./CHAIRM)
  • DOUGLAS MCNABB (VICE-PRES./S)
  • BARTON BONN (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To educate individuals that uv exposure is the body's natural, intended and most efficient source of vitamin d; acknowledge that indoor lifestyles and sun avoidance have unnaturally deprived people from attaining natural vitamin d levels; recognize that overzealous sun-protection and sun avoidance cause vitamin d deficiency; affirm that uv light is a robust source of vitamin d; increase awareness of the potential effects of vitamin d deficiency and fund the continuation of vitamin d research.

What it reported doing in 2014

The vitamin d alliance helped to bring vitamin d deficiency awareness through education, public relations planning, and fulfillment. In 2013 the alliance reported to various industry groups and public groups on the research related to vitamin d deficiency, and the actions recommended by various medical and scientific authorities. The vitamin d alliance also supplied governmental representatives with information related to vitamin d deficiency and the ramifications of such deficiencies.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 14
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.09; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -41.4% per year; rating input score 0; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -20.7% per year; rating input score 0; 46th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 2 of 2 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2010 to 2014
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 28/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.