The Virginia Home

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
540577900
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-T 2024
Location
Richmond, VA, US
Phone
(804) 359-4093
Rating
69
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Nursing, Convalescent Facilities

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$67,455,077
Expenses
$26,578,730
Assets
$201,972,960
Liabilities
$9,796,728

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

38 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DOUGLAS VAUGHAN (PRESIDENT & CEO)
  • WILLIAM COLEMAN (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT / COO)
  • MICHAEL DOWDY (VICE PRESIDENT FOR ADVANCEMENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • DOUGLAS VAUGHAN (PRESIDENT & CEO): $422,714 total reported compensation
  • WILLIAM COLEMAN (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT / COO): $326,547 total reported compensation
  • SEEMA PATEL (MEDICAL DIRECTOR): $270,702 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Virginia Home provides a secure lifetime residence and nursing care for adults living with physical disabilities.

What it reported doing in 2025

Residents living at the Virginia home require around-the-clock care. In addition to providing professional nursing support, we give each person an opportunity to live a life with dignity, respect, and provide each person the chance to pursue personal dreams and enjoy new experiences regardless of the physical challenges one may face. The Virginia home provides outstanding nursing, dental and medical services to ensure the comfort and convenience of all residents. Services include: - complete 24-hour nursing care and a full-time medical director - private rooms, daily housekeeping, and weekly laundry service - physical, occupational, recreational, and speech therapy - private transportation services via a fleet of six vehicles - therapeutic recreation opportunities both on-site and out in the community - on-site routine dental services in our fully-equipped dental clinic - counseling services for residents and their families - wheelchair repair and maintenance - access to adaptive and assistive technology - multi-day trips to exciting destinations through our community integration department and our travel scholarship program - for off-site medical care, we transport residents to and from regional hospitals and medical providers. Staff members accompany all residents to any off-site appointment if requested.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 51
  • Transparency & Controls: 76
  • Accountability: 86
  • Sustainability: 79
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 32.6%; rating input score 33
  • Program expense ratio: 79.7%; rating input score 80
  • Fundraising efficiency: $32.53 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 60.6%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.6; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 12.1%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 4% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 9.7% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.2% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 9 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 2 operating locations identified
  • Where the money goes: 32.6% of revenue deployed · 79.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 24 of 24 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $21.2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $423K · 38 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 31 of 33 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 14 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 33/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 9 not reported.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 58/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule D expense reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule D revenue reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.