The Village at Rockville

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
530196624
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Rockville, MD, US
Phone
301-479-6047
Rating
74
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Supportive Housing for Older Adults

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$45,340,694
Expenses
$45,046,288
Assets
$144,294,107
Liabilities
$138,395,433

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CYNTHIA WALTERS (PRESIDENT/CEO)
  • DONNA CASNER (VICE PRESIDENT FINANCE)
  • FELICIA ANTHONY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • CYNTHIA WALTERS (PRESIDENT/CEO): $497,990 total reported compensation
  • DONNA CASNER (VICE PRESIDENT FINANCE): $239,617 total reported compensation
  • FELICIA ANTHONY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $238,573 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Village at Rockville is a faith-based, not-for-profit Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC) serving older adults with a full continuum of care, emphasizing freedom of choice and a dynamic lifestyle.

What it reported doing in 2024

Skilled nursing: the village at rockville, national lutheran community's 160 bed long-term and short term skilled nursing care is a collaborative effort that involves the resident, their family and the staff. Continual communication motivates families to entrust their loved ones in the village at rockville's care.under the skilled nursing banner is the program mypotential rehabilitation. Through this program, the village at rockville offers physical therapy, occupational therapy, and speech/language pathology to guests recovering from injury, illness or a planned surgery. Mypotential rehabilitation is 100% focused on each individual's rehabilitation goals, creating personalized plans to help them gain back optimum independence. Guests' goals direct the efforts of the rehab team, including physicians, nurses, therapists, discharge planners, nutritionists, a personalized mypotential rehabilitation coach and a concierge. Mypotential rehabilitation is designed to get guests back to doing the things they love most confidently, efficiently and comfortably.both programs include 24-hour visitation, a 24-hour skilled nursing team, physical services onsite, therapy specialist, pastoral care, infusion/iv services, bariatric care, wound care, total parenteral nutrition, respiratory services and hospice services.since its inception in 1890, no resident has been asked to leave the village at rockville due to diminished resources. The cost of benevolent care provided amount to approximately $2,007,000 in 2024. Residents who are unable to pay for services, at all levels of care as needed and when appropriate, are provided for without charge or at amounts less than rockville's established rates. Because the organization does not pursue collection of amounts determined to be benevolent care, they are not reported as resident service revenues. The organization maintains records to identify and monitor the level of benevolent care it provides. The estimated costs of providing benevolent care is based upon the direct and indirect costs identified with the specific benevolent care provided.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 94% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 75
  • Transparency & Controls: 65
  • Accountability: 85
  • Sustainability: 49
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 84%; rating input score 84
  • Program expense ratio: 85.7%; rating input score 86
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 83.3%; rating input score 83; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0.6%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.2; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.96; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 2.2%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.3% per year; rating input score 100; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6.2% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 84% of revenue deployed · 85.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 5 of 6 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $38.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $498K · 12 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 6 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 36/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: CEO compensation review process not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 7/100.