The Village at Morrisons Cove

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
231381403
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
Martinsburg, PA, USA
Phone
8147932104
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$17,426,443
Expenses
$16,008,131
Assets
$16,582,561
Liabilities
$7,375,391

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

16 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • COREY JONES (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • COREY JONES (CEO): $331,536 total reported compensation
  • BONNIE ROBINSON (NURSING HOME ADMINISTRATOR): $133,311 total reported compensation
  • MATTIE VERBIT (CRNP): $103,982 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The village at morrisons cove, in affiliation with the middle Pennsylvania district church of the brethren, is established to serve the members of the church of the brethren and our neighbors in the larger community. The village at morrisons cove provides a residential community and health care to men and women in active retirement as well as to those in need of convalescence, assisted living, or long term health care. Believing that god charges us to care for the whole person, the village provides services that enrich the spiritual, emotional, social, intellectual, and physical lives of residents.

What it reported doing in 2024

Skilled nursing services are provided in a comfortable health care center. The level of care is available on both a long-term and short-term basis and provides for 24 hour skilled nursing care. The village has a 124 bed skilled nursing facility and provided 28,891 skilled nursing census days in 2024. Personal care services provide an intermediate level of care when residents need help with some activities of daily living, but do not require 24 hour skilled nursing care. This encourages residents to function at their highest level of independence. The village has 33 personal care beds and provided 8,086 personal care census days in 2024. Independent living services provide comprehensive home maintenance, on-site nursing staff for emergent care, and health checks for residents. The village has 73 independent living cottages and a 31 unit independent living apartment building and had 42,173 independent living census days in 2024. The village also offers a multitude of in-home services that are not only available to our residents on the village campus but also to people who live within the surrounding communities. These in-home services consist of home care, home health care, and hospice services. Home care ("aging-in- place") services provides in-home support services that can help clients maintain an active and healthy lifestyle. These services can be provided 24 hours a day, seven days a week and can range from as little as an hour to 24 hours of companionship, as needed. Home health care ("village-in- place") services provides quality home health care services to clients in their own home after hospitalization, a change in health status or when they need intermittent skilled home health care because they are homebound. Hospice ("village-in-place hospice") services provides palliative and supportive care to clients and their family in the peacefulness of their own home. Benevolent care: the village provides care to residents who meet certain criteria under its benevolent care policy and are unable to pay for services. Because the village does not pursue collection of amounts determined to be benevolent care, they are not reported as revenue. The cost of providing benevolent care is based upon direct and indirect costs identified with the specific benevolent care provided.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 78% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and assets have declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 70
  • Transparency & Controls: 84
  • Accountability: 86
  • Sustainability: 51
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 76.5%; rating input score 76
  • Program expense ratio: 83.8%; rating input score 84
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 8.1%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.04; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.44; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.1%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 0.6% per year; rating input score 100; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.4% per year; rating input score 100; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1.2% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 76.5% of revenue deployed · 83.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $13.4M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $332K · 16 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $2.6M reported
  • Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 33/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 59/100.