The Vehicle-grid-integration Alliance

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
464710745
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2019
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2019
Location
Davis, CA, USA
Phone
4153102407
Rating
34
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
General Science

Reported finances

Revenue
$500
Expenses
$680
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • RICHARD SCHORSKE (PRESIDENT)
  • SHARON TOBAR (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • RICHARD SCHORSKE (PRESIDENT)
  • SHARON TOBAR (VICE PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Vehicle-Grid-Integration Alliance partners with industry and public sector to accelerate the depoyment of electric vehicles and charging infrastructure, renewable energy system, and advanced energy storage.

What it reported doing in 2019

The independence to represent consumers as primary stakeholder- particularly lower-income consumers. For the VGI Alliance, the benefit of consumers is a central concern- because consumers must reap sufficient economicfrom EV grid integration into the grid that will increase EV sales and accelerate EV grid integration.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 15
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -36%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -40.4% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -29.3% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1.4% per year; rating input score 0; 35th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2015 to 2019
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 16/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.