The Ute Trail Ranch Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
237087227
IRS 990-PF coverage
2016–2024
Forms available
Form 990-PF 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
Dallas, TX, USA
Phone
2147527244
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard

Reported finances

Revenue
$822,986
Expenses
$136,316

Source: IRS Form 990-PF. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Overview

Mission

The Ute Trail Ranch Foundation is a nonprofit. Location: Dallas, TX. EIN 237087227. Tax year 2024 Form 990-PF reports $823K revenue and $136K expenses.

What it reported funding in 2024

The foundation reported 3 grants totaling $59,012. The stated grant purposes included various, facilitate training and provide resources to aide in identifying past issues that negatively affect life and then assist in letting them go and learn to see and hear in a new way with a new truth, and promotes the threefold spiritual, mental and physical development of boys, girls, men and women.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 95% of the foundation's positive operating resources came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The foundation distributed 100% of its reported charitable disbursements as grants.
  • Includes asset-sale income: Asset-sale income is shown separately from recurring resources when classifying the revenue model.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes to charitable grants and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of spending goes to grants.

Rating breakdown

  • Grant Deployment: 85
  • Cost Efficiency: 43
  • Transparency: 100
  • Compliance: 100
  • Endowment Health: 97

Detailed rating inputs

Grant Deployment

  • Grant deployment ratio: 85.3%; rating input score 85; 21st percentile among comparable filings

Cost Efficiency

  • Grant expense ratio: 43.3%; rating input score 43; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency

  • Grant recipient disclosure: Yes; rating input score 100

Compliance

  • Part VII-B activity disclosures: 19 of 19 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Property sale or exchange with a disqualified person: Pass
    • Borrowing from or lending to a disqualified person: Pass
    • Goods, services, or facilities involving a disqualified person: Pass
    • Compensation paid to a disqualified person: Pass
    • Assets transferred to a disqualified person: Pass
    • Payment to a government official: Pass
    • Uncorrected prior self-dealing: Pass
    • Prior-year undistributed income: Pass
    • Excess business holdings: Pass
    • Investments that may jeopardize charitable purposes: Pass
    • Uncorrected prior-year jeopardizing investments: Pass
    • Attempt to influence legislation: Pass
    • Attempt to influence an election: Pass
    • Grants to individuals: Pass
    • Grants to organizations: Pass
    • Spending for a noncharitable purpose: Pass
    • Funds received for a personal-benefit contract: Pass
    • Premiums paid on a personal-benefit contract: Pass
    • Prohibited tax-shelter transaction: Pass
  • Filing consistency checks: 10; rating input score 100

Endowment Health

  • Endowment-health comparison: 189.06; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Grants: 100% of grant recipient detail disclosed
  • Payout: 85.3% grant deployment rate
  • Trustees: Filed trustees detail
  • Self-dealing: 100% of reviewed questions answered “No”
  • Investments: 97th percentile for endowment coverage
  • Consistency: 10 of 10 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2016 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Cost Efficiency: Grant expense ratio scored 43/100.