The Urban Farm
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 841304443
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Denver, CO, USA
- Phone
- 3033079332
- Rating
- 88
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Delinquency Prevention
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,913,019
- Expenses
- $2,038,063
- Assets
- $780,589
- Liabilities
- $397,992
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- PAIGE HEYDON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- AMY MARRS (PRESIDENT)
- CHRIS GOEBEL (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- PAIGE HEYDON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $112,199 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide urban residents the opportunity to participate in agriculture by removing the barriers to entry such as land access, time, location and finances; and inspire excitement through practical experience while fostering respect, responsibility, curiosity, compassion and grit
What it reported doing in 2025
The urban farm (tuf) provides an opportunity for urban youth to engage and participate in local and agricultural systems and farming by removing barriers to participation such as access to land, location and cost. Tuf delivers experiential programs in animal husbandry; organic gardening; environmental education; land conservation and equine. The goal of tuf programs is to provide practical and behavioral life skills for young adults. Our aspiration is to foster compassion and resilience in urban youth and inspire them to build sustainable, healthy, equitable communities. Tuf serves denver metro area residents through year-round programming, signature events, and general admission, all strengthened by our partnerships with local governments and with like-minded nonprofits. Farm to school: pre k-12 students enjoy field trips to the farm. Curriculum is aligned with educational standards in natural and social sciences. Through hands-on activities, students learn abount agriculture, livestock, food systems and horticulture. An estimated 20,000 students participated in the field trips. Tuf grows 13,000 lbs yearly of healthy produce that is then donated back to the community, specifically to lower income households who may have barriers to healthy produce. All around the farm - summer camp: tuf served an estimated 800 children through summer camp, with an additional 150 kids through the summer equine camp. In both camps, youth learn how to care for animals, cultivate crops and become stewards of the land. Tuf removes barriers to the sport which is typically limited to those who can afford to lease or buy a horse. Cultivating change in youth: tuf and denver juvenile services host a collaborative program for at risk and justice involved kids. Since the inception of the program, more than 320 youth have successfully completed the program. Tuf provides earn-while-you-learn opportunities to youth as they learn about horticulture and food systems, animal husbandry and animal care and environmental conservation. Livestock clubs and classes: tuf is the only 4-h club in denver and one of only a few on the front range. Tuf holds clubs and classes that allow participants to utilize animals that live at the farm. Youth learn how to raise, breed and show livestock. Tufs livestock classes sell out every year.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 88
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 21
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 95.2%; rating input score 95
- Program expense ratio: 89.3%; rating input score 89
- Fundraising efficiency: $18.74 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -6.5%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.38; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.51; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.5%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 17.3% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 16.4% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 17.5% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 95.2% of revenue deployed · 89.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 12 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.8M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $112K · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2013 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 54/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 17/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 19/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 12/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 49/100.