The Upper Arlington Booster Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
316050151
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Upper Arlington, OH, USA
Phone
6144573793
Rating
62
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Secondary, High School

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$61,660
Expenses
$18,312
Assets
$125,439

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MICHAEL STUMMER (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • MICHAEL STUMMER (PRESIDENT)
  • JOHN PAIDER (VICE PRESIDE)
  • JOHN LANDOLFI (STATUTORY AG)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To support upper arlington school atheltic programs.

What it reported doing in 2024

For the year ended 6/30/2025 season, the ua booster club supported a total of 33 teams at upper arlington high school. The ua booster club operated the concession stands at all football, soccer, field hockey, basketball, lacrosse and track and field games for the freshman, junior varsity and varsity teams, both boys and girls. A total of almost 130 separate events was managed in its primary effort to raise funds for all inter-scholastic sports at upper arlington high school. This was accomplished with over 200 volunteers in support of over 700 athletes.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 97% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 41
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 78
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 23%; rating input score 23
  • Program expense ratio: 70.4%; rating input score 70

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 70.3%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.85; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3.5% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 9.4% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 9% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 23% of revenue deployed · 70.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $13K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 23/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.