The United Arc Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 042267562
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Turners Falls, MA, USA
- Phone
- 4137745558
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Developmentally Disabled Centers
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $5,253,016
- Expenses
- $5,207,094
- Assets
- $1,901,768
- Liabilities
- $1,430,588
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DOREEN GALLIEN (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- DOREEN GALLIEN (PRESIDENT)
- SUE JONES (DIRECTOR)
- LYNN YORK (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
See schedule othe united arc supports people living with intellectual and developmental disabilities in achieving the universal goals of inclusion, choice and independence. All people are valued and deserve full access to opportunities in the community. All planning, decisions, and services will be based on or adapted to individual needs and aspirations. We maximize quality and impact when we partner with families, donors, payers, other providers, and the communities in which we operate. We serve individuals of all backgrounds and seek staff and board members with diverse skills, perspectives, and cultural backgrounds. We treat everyone with dignity, honor appropriate boundaries, and scrupulously steward the agency's financial resources.
What it reported doing in 2024
Positive parenting provides in home training and support to families focusing on the areas of child development, education, household organization, habits of healthy living and the larger social service field.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 95% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 79
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 33
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 84.2%; rating input score 84
- Program expense ratio: 85.2%; rating input score 85
- Fundraising efficiency: $8.76 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.9%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.37; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.75; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -0.9% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0.3% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -1.1% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 84.2% of revenue deployed · 85.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 7 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $4.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 33/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 37/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 12/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 12/100.