UPH Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
840404262
IRS 990-PF coverage
2022–2024
Official website data refreshed
Jul 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2020, Form 990-PF 2024
Location
Pittsburgh, PA, US
Phone
4122548304
Rating
40
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Corporate Foundations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$502,531
Expenses
$455,520

Source: IRS Form 990-PF. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Overview

Mission

To extend charitable aid to communities and individuals in need through scholarship, community services, and grant programs.

For more than 130 years, the Union Printers Home Foundation has provided charitable aid to communities and individuals in need. Since 1892, it established one of the country's earliest centers for convalescent care and chronic illness treatment. Today, it operates scholarship, community services, and grant programs to support education, health, and social well-being. As of 2023, its philanthropic contributions exceed $296,550,803.

Operating model

Revenue model
Investment-supported. 97% of the foundation's positive operating resources came from recurring investment income.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The foundation carried out 100% of its reported charitable disbursements directly.
  • Includes asset-sale income: Asset-sale income is shown separately from recurring resources when classifying the revenue model.

The verdict

MIXED - A large share of available resources goes to charitable grants and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of spending goes to grants and the filing does not identify all grant recipients.

Rating breakdown

  • Grant Deployment: 69
  • Cost Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency: 0
  • Compliance: 98
  • Endowment Health: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Grant Deployment

  • Grant deployment ratio: 68.7%; rating input score 69; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Cost Efficiency

  • Grant expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency

  • Grant recipient disclosure: Scored; rating input score 0

Compliance

  • Part VII-B activity disclosures: 18 of 19 controls in place; rating input score 95
    • Property sale or exchange with a disqualified person: Pass
    • Borrowing from or lending to a disqualified person: Pass
    • Goods, services, or facilities involving a disqualified person: Pass
    • Compensation paid to a disqualified person: Pass
    • Assets transferred to a disqualified person: Pass
    • Payment to a government official: Pass
    • Uncorrected prior self-dealing: Pass
    • Prior-year undistributed income: Pass
    • Excess business holdings: Pass
    • Investments that may jeopardize charitable purposes: Pass
    • Uncorrected prior-year jeopardizing investments: Pass
    • Attempt to influence legislation: Pass
    • Attempt to influence an election: Pass
    • Grants to individuals: Fail
    • Grants to organizations: Pass
    • Spending for a noncharitable purpose: Pass
    • Funds received for a personal-benefit contract: Pass
    • Premiums paid on a personal-benefit contract: Pass
    • Prohibited tax-shelter transaction: Pass
  • Filing consistency checks: 10; rating input score 100

Endowment Health

  • Endowment-health comparison: Limited

Details

  • What they fund: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site
  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Payout: 68.7% grant deployment rate
  • Trustees: Filed trustees detail
  • Self-dealing: 100% of reviewed questions answered “No”
  • Investments: Filed investments detail
  • Consistency: 10 of 10 current checks pass
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Cost Efficiency: Grant expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Transparency: Grant recipient disclosure scored 0/100.
  • Review — Compliance: Part VII-B activity disclosures: Grants to individuals not reported.