The Undergraduate Interfraternity Council at the University of Colorado
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 841104982
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Denver, CO, USA
- Phone
- 3034896584
- Rating
- 64
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Educational Services and Schools - Other
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $360,997
- Expenses
- $354,920
- Assets
- $117,206
- Liabilities
- $-1,285
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Owen Lindsay (President)
Highest reported compensation
- Owen Lindsay (President): $6,600 total reported compensation
- Baxter Romero (DIR TECHNOLOGY): $5,400 total reported compensation
- Luis Rubio (VP FINANCE/OPS): $5,300 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To serve as the governing council of the men's fraternities whose members are students of the University of Colorado in order to encourage closer collaboration and coordination among the member fraternities and the community in which we reside.
What it reported doing in 2024
MEMBERSHIP & RECRUITMENT: The most important activity is serving as the coordinating organization for the recruitment of new fraternity members each semester. This involves providing information about the entire fraternity community and making that information available to any male student at the University of Colorado Boulder who might be interested in being a member of a fraternity which is a member of the UIFC. This activity occurs each semester. Fall semester is the most significant time for recruitment. The UIFC collects the information on approximately 1500 young men who wish to be considered for membership. The UIFC compiles all of this information and circulates the information to all of its members. During the recruiting period, the UIFC provides daily reports on the status of all members recruiting events. Once the recruiting period is done, the UIFC provides a celebratory Bid Day which recognizes each young man who has accepted a bid. This same process occurs during spring semester on a smaller scale.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 40
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 72
- Sustainability: 28
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 44.5%; rating input score 45
- Program expense ratio: 45.3%; rating input score 45
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1.7%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.33; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 15.6%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 29% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.4% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11.8% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 44.5% of revenue deployed · 45.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 3 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $7K · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 20 of 20 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 12 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 45/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 45/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 43/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 17/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 24/100.