The Tyler Frederes Memorial Fund
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 471194073
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2016–2018
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2018, Form 990-N 2014
- Location
- Overland Park, KS, USA
- Phone
- 9132382794
- Rating
- 64
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Amateur Sports
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $43,037
- Expenses
- $37,696
- Assets
- $30,471
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Mick Frederes (President)
- Debby Frederes (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Blake Dubinski (Treasurer)
- Mick Frederes (President)
- Debby Frederes (Vice President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Enable underprivilged or disadvantaged athletes to participate in the Mid-West Amateur Hocky Association (MWAHA) or other similar associations. Funds will be utilized to pay dues, fees, and/or expenses that would otherwise preclude, hinder, or restrict the athlete from participation. The MWAH, a 501(c)(3) organization, is the official governing body for USA Hockey in the states of Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska. MWAHA's state purpos is to assist in the growth and development of hockey promoting sportsmanship, respect for individual athletes, integrity, loyalty, enjoyment, teamwork, and the pursuit of excellence.
What it reported doing in 2018
Donation to Midwest Amateur Hockey Association for Player Awards so that deserving players could pursue their hockey dreams. Donated funds went to fees, equipment, and expensess for players who are financially challenged.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 93% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 47
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 50
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 44.9%; rating input score 45
- Program expense ratio: 51.3%; rating input score 51
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 12.4%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.81; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 23.2% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 20% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 44.9% of revenue deployed · 51.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $19K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2016 to 2018
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 45/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 51/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 42/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.