The Twelve Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
993702152
IRS 990 coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Roanoke, VA, USA
Phone
5407985179
Rating
49
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Alcohol, Drug Abuse, Treatment Only

Reported finances

Revenue
$15,731
Expenses
$1,151
Assets
$14,580
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Donna Littlepage (Board Chair & pro bono Executive Director)

People named in this filing

  • Donna Littlepage (Board Chair & pro bono Executive Director)
  • Dr Kim Simcox (Vice Chair)
  • Ali Hamed Moore (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Mission: The Twelve Foundation seeks to create equal opportunities for quality substance use disorder treatment, which would otherwise be unaffordable, by mobilizing our community to support individuals and families seeking recovery. Our flagship program, The Grove on Patterson, will support pregnant and parenting persons seeking treatment with their children.

What it reported doing in 2024

The Twelve Foundation was established March 12, 2024 with the goal to open a residential substance use treatment center for pregnant and newly parenting women. During 2024, our partner Restoration Housing purchased a home and renovated it to house up to 16 women with their children. It received its Certificate of Occupancy in March 2025. They will be the landlord for The Twelve Foundation at a nominal rent rate going forward. We then furnished the house and it received its licensure by the Commonwealth of Virginia to be a residential treatment center for pregnant and parenting women in April 2025. We then accepted our first pregnant women with substance use disorder in May 2025 and are now accepting new residents until we reach our maximum of sixteen. We are excited to offer this service to the residents of our community and beyond.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 88
  • Sustainability: 82
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 92.7%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 12.67; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 13 of 13 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.