The Troy Support Organization

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
412052114
IRS 990 coverage
2014–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2013
Location
Fullerton, CA, USA
Phone
9492325781
Rating
63
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$78,247
Expenses
$30,629
Assets
$78,904
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

14 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Linda Toy (President)
  • Grace Wu (President)

People named in this filing

  • Aparna Narsina (Treasurer)
  • Linda Toy (President)
  • Grace Wu (President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Support Troy High School students' programs and activities

What it reported doing in 2024

Troy Support Organization Accomplishments for year June,2024 to June,2025: Troy Support Organization, TSO provided gifts totaling over $35,000 to Troy High School this past fiscal year. Troy students received extended library hours, so they have a safe and inviting study space before and after school. Troy students benefited from gifts for coaching support to teachers as they implement a curriculum which incorporates the use of digital technologies .TSO is gifted for Troy Tech pre-internship coaches to support real world experience for our Troy students and for AVID mentors to prepare our students for the challenge of honors and Advanced Placement classwork. TSO celebrated its Troy high 60th anniversary fundraising event to raise over $20,000 across the various clubs to donate monies to help with various club events like Boys water polo, Drone competitions . With corporate grants and matching gifts, Troy Tech program received nearly $6,000 in support for the Troy Tech Mentor Breakfast and the Troy Tech internship Fair, International Baccalaureate IB Program received monies to award graduation seniors. In partnership with Troy booster clubs, TSO raised over $10,000 in gifts to Troy sports teams. TSO also continued to partner with the English department for the first time to host Summer English Camp which raised over $20,000 for their department.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 73% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 52
  • Transparency & Controls: 80
  • Accountability: 76
  • Sustainability: 69
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 31.8%; rating input score 32
  • Program expense ratio: 81.2%; rating input score 81
  • Fundraising efficiency: $19.83 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 60.9%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.58; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -4.1% per year; rating input score 0; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -0.2% per year; rating input score 0; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -2.2% per year; rating input score 0; 30th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 31.8% of revenue deployed · 81.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 11 of 4 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $25K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 14 people listed
  • Consistency: 15 of 16 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 32/100.
  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Independent members within voting members did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 38/100.