The Tribal Child Care Association of California

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
472853542
IRS 990 coverage
2021–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Colusa, CA, USA
Phone
5306745374
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Child Day Care

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,213,274
Expenses
$1,350,586
Assets
$1,067,592
Liabilities
$519,629

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

14 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KIMBERLY NALL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • KIMBERLY NALL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $144,722 total reported compensation
  • KATHLEEN EREDIA (FISCAL DIRECTOR): $124,021 total reported compensation
  • JENNIFER MCGOWAN (OPERATIONS DIRECTOR): $122,239 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To sustain and maintain high quality, culturally relevant child care programs through the unification of tribal voices and by providing support, sharing knowledge, educating tribes, federal, state, and local governments and agencies.

What it reported doing in 2024

The tribal quality improvement system (tqis), developed by the tribal child care association of California (tccac), is a statewide initiative grounded in tribal sovereignty, cultural responsiveness, and continuous quality improvement. The tqis serves as a framework for tribal early learning and care (elc) programs to define, implement, measure quality from within their communities. Over 30 tribal elc programs participated in the 2024 tqis. The tccac expanded tools such as self-assessments, quality improvement plans, and workforce development tracking, enabling providers to set meaningful goals and document progress. Mid-year updates demonstrated meaningful progress among many participants. Key outcomes included: - increased cultural integration: programs incorporated local tribal languages and traditional foods into daily programming. - improved team collaboration: several sites hosted regular team meetings and staff development sessions. - policy and compliance advancements: sites updated health and safety policies using tccac's templates.collaborative training sessions and monthly meetings built shared capacity in areas like mentoring, coaching, family engagement, and culturally grounded listening. By centering tribal voices in quality improvement and ensuring resources were both practical and culturally responsive, tqis advanced equity and sustainability for tribal child care programs statewide, benefiting children, families, and communities.the tccac advanced its workforce pathways program that provides culturally responsive professional development and financial support for tribal early learning and care providers across the state. The program supported more than 250 tribal elc providers through seven tailored professional development pathways and higher education supports. Providers had opportunities to strengthen skills while honoring tribal knowledge and practices. The program offered stipends, tuition assistance, and reimbursement for licensing and educational expenses, reducing barriers to participation and promoting equitable access. By investing in the workforce, tccac not only built individual provider capacity but also supported long-term sustainability and quality in tribal child care systems.the tribal child care association of California (tccac) strengthened relationships and capacity across tribal early learning and care programs by hosting impactful in-person events statewide. The annual tccac conference brought together tribal leaders, child care providers, and partners to share best practices, celebrate cultural strengths, and engage in professional learning. An annual members meetings provided a vital forum for tribal programs to guide tccac's priorities and collaborate on quality improvement goals, while roundtable meetings with state and federal partners elevated tribal voices in shaping policies and resources. In addition, dedicated workforce training days were hosted two times a year in different regions of the state. These trainings offered hands-on learning in areas such as literacy, inclusion, trauma-informed care, and leadership development. These gatherings fostered connection, collaboration, and culturally grounded learning, ensuring that tribal communities were both leading and benefiting from statewide efforts to improve child care quality.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 72% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 83% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 64
  • Transparency & Controls: 94
  • Accountability: 91
  • Sustainability: 20
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 74.6%; rating input score 75
  • Program expense ratio: 66.7%; rating input score 67
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -11.3%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.79; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.49; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 32.9%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 10.9% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 13.8% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 48.1% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 74.6% of revenue deployed · 66.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $901K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $145K · 14 people listed
  • Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 14 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 15/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 35/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 16/100.