The Title of Liberty Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
200387152
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2018
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2018, Form 990-N 2007
Location
Idaho Falls, ID, USA
Phone
2085220108
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Support N.E.C.

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$2,491
Assets
$16,363
Liabilities
$500

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DEVAR CLUFF (President)

People named in this filing

  • DEVAR CLUFF (President)
  • REBECCA CLUFF (Director)
  • BENJAMIN CLUFF (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Uniting neighbors in remembering and defending god, family, faith, peace, and freedom by raising the title of liberty as a standard to as many people in as many lands as possible.

What it reported doing in 2018

The organization has actively promoted the uniting of people in defending god, family, faith, peace, and freedom by raising the title of liberty as a standard. This has been achieved through several activities and events including sales and distribution of title of liberty flags and apparel, 4th of july at liberty field, the healing field at Idaho falls, release of title of liberty cd, and sponsoring booths at trade shows and other events. These efforts have resulted in increasing the general public's awareness of the importance of god, family, faith, peace, and freedom. Although the benefits are not measurable, these activities have had a positive effect on individuals by encouraging them to be more active in their families and communities and in promoting any activity that supports and uplifts our free society.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 38
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 36
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.57; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -4.5% per year; rating input score 0; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -84.6% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -17.1% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2011 to 2018
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 31/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.