The Tiny Tim Rescue Fund Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
611656279
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2023
Location
New York, NY, USA
Phone
6462296867
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Animal Protection and Welfare

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$48,453
Expenses
$43,768
Assets
$11,897
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JOHN BARTLETT (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JOHN BARTLETT (PRESIDENT)
  • WENDY GUERERRA (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose for which the corporation is formed is to provide shelter, medical care, and love to abused, abandoned, neglected, and unwanted animals until permanent homes can be found. The corporation will solicit and receive donations, contributions, gifts, bequests and grants which in turn will be used to make gifts and grants to other not-for-profit entities committed to providing shelter, medical care, and love to abused, abandoned, neglected, and unwanted animals until permanent homes can be found.

What it reported doing in 2025

In 2025, we assisted with the life saving work of transporting and covering medical costs for over 30 dogs, bringing them north to safety from high risk shelters in rural Louisiana where the dogs were on the euthanasia list. We were awarded grants to independent sanctuaries and rescue groups. We helped to sponsor life saving medical treatments and surgeries for rescue groups that needed financial assistance. We worked with local New York shelters to help raise awareness about long term dogs and to help finance training and medical treatments.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 79% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 49
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 9.7%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.27; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 186.6% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 8.6% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 11.3% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2011 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 22/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.