The Thielen Foundation Inc C/o Lukas Inveiss
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 825085997
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2018–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Minneapolis, MN, USA
- Phone
- 3202916119
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Public Foundations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,203,423
- Expenses
- $597,634
- Assets
- $2,406,456
- Liabilities
- $1,530
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ADAM THIELEN (PRESIDENT)
- CAITLIN THIELEN (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- ADAM THIELEN (PRESIDENT)
- CAITLIN THIELEN (VICE PRESIDENT)
- LUKAS INVEISS (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The thielen foundation has been formed to help serve, educate and inspire those in need. With an overarching theme on youth development, the thielen foundation aims to create programs that will equip and empower kids to reach their full potential in life.
What it reported doing in 2024
Here at the thielen foundation, we believe in the power of sport. The power of sport can change our society by showcasing our differences and similarities and how we can come together as a team to achieve a greater goal. We also believe the zip code you are born in should not determine your future potential which is why we developed the #changethrusport campaign. The #changethrusport program was developed in 2020 to stand in the gap for underserved youth in the upper midwest. The thielen foundation boldly puts its passion into action by providing financial support, much needed sports equipment and apparel, along with hope and inspiration for youth to dream big and attain their goals on and off the playing field and set them up for success in life. In 2024, thielen foundation took on two new partner high schools, one in st. Paul, mn (como hs) and one in charlotte, nc (mallard creek hs) -- and did a complete makeover of their weight rooms and added their schools to our legacy program of giving $50,000 in 5 - $1,000 student athletes scholarships annually, over the next 10 years. To date, the thielen foundation has donated to youth athletic teams, high schools and organizations that were in dire need of funding and equipment to keep their programming up and to provide consistent training, discipline and positive character building through coaching
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 69% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 83% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 56
- Transparency & Controls: 81
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 86
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 45.3%; rating input score 45
- Program expense ratio: 92.4%; rating input score 92
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 68.3%; rating input score 68; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 50.3%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.03; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 20.7% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 21.5% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 33.7% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 45.3% of revenue deployed · 92.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $552K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 20 of 21 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2018 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 12 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 12 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 45/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.