The Tewaaraton Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 454596535
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990 2019, Form 990-EZ 2020
- Location
- Washington, DC, USA
- Phone
- 7035085655
- Rating
- 46
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Scholarships, Student Financial Aid Services, Awards
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $109,769
- Expenses
- $43,767
- Assets
- $165,038
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
People named in this filing
- JEFFREY HARVEY (CHAIRMAN)
- NEIL ALT (DIRECTOR)
- SYLVESTER MINITER (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The tewaaraton foundation is a non-profit organization tasked with fulfilling the mission of the tewaaraton award. This mission is to:1. Recognize excellence in the game of lacrosse by annually honoring the most outstanding men's and women's ncaa players.2. Celebrate legends of the game that would have won the award had it existed in their playing days.3. Honor the native american history of the sport through the award's name and through the spirit of the tewaaraton award, which recognizes those that have contributed to the advancement of the sport.4. Give back to the native american community by providing scholarships to native american college bound students that play lacrosse.
What it reported doing in 2020
Tewaaraton award ceremony
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 96% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 7
- Transparency & Controls: 93
- Sustainability: 88
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 4.5%; rating input score 4
- Program expense ratio: 11.3%; rating input score 11
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 60.1%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.77; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -29% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 79.4% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 4.5% of revenue deployed · 11.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $5K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 4/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 11/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.