The Tandana Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 204748423
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2012, Form 990-N 2007
- Location
- Spring Valley, OH, USA
- Phone
- 9373101140
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Kindergarten, Preschool, Nursery School, Early Admissions
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $928,725
- Expenses
- $859,961
- Assets
- $999,012
- Liabilities
- $3,255
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- HOPE TAFT (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- AARON DIMARTINO (SENIOR OPERATIONS DIRECTOR): $55,000 total reported compensation
- ANNA TAFT (FOUNDING DIRECTOR): $39,728 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Creating cross-cultural volunteer opportunities, scholarships, and funding for small community projects in highland ecuador and mali's dogon country.
What it reported doing in 2024
Tandana provided funding for several community initiatives in mali: publishing the first storybook ever in the tommoso language, the hyena, the hare, and the baobab and released it in the tommoguin community as well as in the united states; facilitating women's leadership workshops for 100 women; tommo so literacy program for 341 women; student mothers program for 10 young mothers; support for 175 internally displaced children to attend school in bandiagara including supplemental classes to help them catch up; support for teachers at the elementary schools in andjine, kansongo, and sol-dogon; training for 10 new literacy instructors; food support for 175 internally displaced families in bandiagara so their children can attend school; 7 new women's associations received startup funding to start businesses in market gardening, making seasoning balls, making cotton into cloth, and transforming local products for sale; 25 internally displaced parents started income generating activities in bandiagara with tandana support; construction of a well in bandiagara, that serves many of the internally displaced families who have moved to the town; expansion of 15 ponds to conserve water from the rainy season for use for livestock and market gardening; one-day basic medical clinics in 32 communities; support for the olouguelemo environmental association, which led the following projects: planted 1,630 trees in a reforestation campaign; built 72,122 meters worth of stone contour lines to prevent erosion and retain water in the soil; practiced assisted natural regeneration on 25,890 trees; made 764 improved cookstoves; expanded 15 ponds, which make it possible to garden and to raise livestock; continued to protect 1,222 hectares of forest; held a competition for best assisted natural regeneration in the fields.in ecuador, tandana supported projects that included: construction of stadium-style seating at the soccer field in agualongo; renovation of a bathroom at the school in tangal; painting 3 classrooms at the school in carabuela; painting the 2nd floor of the muenala community center and installation of windows; publishing a new edition of juanita, the colorful butterfly, a tale in kichwa, spanish, and english; supporting a music and art teacher at the elementary school in urkusiki; painting 3 murals at the school in carabuela; painting a mural at the school in quichinche; summer school program for 25 students; planting a vegetable garden and fruit trees at the school in the community of tangal; completion of the potable water system in inguincho; installation of irrigation water pipes and a reservoir to provide water for income generating projects such as growing fruit and farming tilapia in yambiro; the women's association in yambiro participated in basic training in how to run small businesses on an ongoing basis; the school in tangal started an income generating project raising and selling guinea pigs; one-day medical clinics in 5 communities, one-day dental clinic in 1 community; community health and well-being program which led to the following outcomes: 742 patients received support with medical follow-up care; 16 patients received glasses; 11 patients received support with vision follow-up care; 4 patients received hearing AIDS; 4 patients accessed surgeries; 3 months' supply of nutritional supplements were delivered to 3 adults; 2 months' supply of baby formula was delivered to 1 infant; 1 patient received a prosthetic eye.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 78% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 78% for direct work, and 22% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 76
- Transparency & Controls: 80
- Accountability: 96
- Sustainability: 53
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 77.6%; rating input score 78
- Program expense ratio: 82.8%; rating input score 83
- Fundraising efficiency: $14.24 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Fail
- Conducts field audits: Fail
- May suspend future funding: Fail
- Requires financial reports: Pass
- Conducts site visits: Fail
- Requires grant agreements: Fail
- May require repayment: Fail
- Grant itemization coverage: 99.5%; rating input score 99; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 7.4%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.16; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 11%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9.9% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 11.3% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 16.4% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 77.6% of revenue deployed · 82.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 14 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $712K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $55K · 16 people listed
- Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and foreign activity
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 6 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 49/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 56/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 47/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 33/100.