The Talbott and Ann Bond Family Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
521661599
IRS 990-PF coverage
2020–2025
Forms available
Form 990-PF 2025
Location
Timonium, MD, USA
Phone
4108420573
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard

Reported finances

Revenue
$12,276
Expenses
$34,573

Source: IRS Form 990-PF. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Overview

Mission

The Talbott and Ann Bond Family Foundation is a nonprofit. Location: Timonium, MD. EIN 521661599.

What it reported funding in 2025

The foundation reported 43 filed grant rows totaling $17,325. The stated grant purposes included humanitarian relief. red cross volunteers and staff work to deliver vital services from providing relief and support to those in crisis, to helping you be prepared to respond in emergencies., empowering worthy nonprofits by providing much-needed unrestricted funds., and protection of animals. the national audubon society protects birds and the places they need, today and tomorrow, throughout the americas using science, advocacy, education, and on-the-ground conservation., plus 35 other reported purposes.

Operating model

Revenue model
Investment-supported. 100% of the foundation's positive operating resources came from recurring investment income.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The foundation distributed 72% of its reported charitable disbursements as grants.
  • Includes asset-sale income: Asset-sale income is shown separately from recurring resources when classifying the revenue model.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes to charitable grants and the filing identifies who received its grants. A relatively small share of spending goes to grants and assets provide a limited cushion relative to annual grants.

Rating breakdown

  • Grant Deployment: 100
  • Cost Efficiency: 50
  • Transparency: 100
  • Compliance: 98
  • Endowment Health: 34

Detailed rating inputs

Grant Deployment

  • Grant deployment ratio: 100%; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings

Cost Efficiency

  • Grant expense ratio: 50.1%; rating input score 50; 20th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency

  • Grant recipient disclosure: Yes; rating input score 100

Compliance

  • Foundation activity disclosures: 18 of 19 controls in place; rating input score 95
    • Property sale or exchange with a disqualified person: Pass
    • Borrowing from or lending to a disqualified person: Pass
    • Goods, services, or facilities involving a disqualified person: Pass
    • Compensation paid to a disqualified person: Fail
    • Assets transferred to a disqualified person: Pass
    • Payment to a government official: Pass
    • Uncorrected prior self-dealing: Pass
    • Prior-year undistributed income: Pass
    • Excess business holdings: Pass
    • Investments that may jeopardize charitable purposes: Pass
    • Uncorrected prior-year jeopardizing investments: Pass
    • Attempt to influence legislation: Pass
    • Attempt to influence an election: Pass
    • Individual grants for travel, study or similar purposes: Pass
    • Grants outside qualifying charitable organization categories: Pass
    • Spending for a noncharitable purpose: Pass
    • Funds received for a personal-benefit contract: Pass
    • Premiums paid on a personal-benefit contract: Pass
    • Prohibited tax-shelter transaction: Pass
  • Filing consistency checks: 9; rating input score 100

Endowment Health

  • Endowment-health comparison: 11.26; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Grants: 100% of grant recipient detail disclosed
  • Payout: At least 100% grant deployment rate
  • Trustees: Filed trustees detail
  • Self-dealing: 100% of reviewed questions answered “No”
  • Investments: 34th percentile for endowment coverage
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 45 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Cost Efficiency: Grant expense ratio scored 50/100.
  • Moderate — Endowment Health: Endowment-health comparison scored 34/100.
  • Review — Compliance: Foundation activity disclosures: Compensation paid to a disqualified person not reported.