The Symbol Syndicate

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
880622815
IRS 990 coverage
2022–2022
Forms available
Form 990 2022
Location
Kirkland, WA, USA
Rating
64
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Engineering and Technology

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,996,291
Expenses
$986,825
Assets
$1,009,540
Liabilities
$74

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

1 person listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Kristy-Leigh A Minehan (President & CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • Kristy-Leigh A Minehan (President & CEO): $26,372 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Symbol Syndicate is dedicated to designing, developing, and maintaining mission critical, open-source software, and improving public education on artificial intelligence, blockchain and other emerging technologies. In addition, the organization maintains clients and supporting code and products for multiple cryptocurrency protocols and DeFi projects, including (but not limited to) Bitcoin, Solana, NEM and Symbol.

What it reported doing in 2022

Most of 2022 was spent in finding the organizations voice and defining its mission; building the organization's brand identity; learning the rules and ropes with regards to a non-profit organization; setting up internal structure and operations; maintaining two cryptocurrency clients (NIS, for the NEM blockchain; and Catapult, for the Symbol blockchain); product improvements; and improving general education and awareness. At this time, the organization has six defined programs. Education and Awareness (shortened to Education): A program centered around increasing the general awareness of our products, and improving public education for emerging technologies. We also define any social media activity, assets, or asset creation not directly related to fundraising as education and awareness. Research: A program centered around high-quality research and data-driven reports. Research may be (but has not yet been) requested by a donor, a university, or another organization; or it may be internal research we undertake. All research created and undertaken with this program is available publicly, or will be available publicly (once completed and presented in accordance with our usual quality standards). Products: A program centered around development, design and maintenance of high quality open-source products used by the general public, such as cryptocurrency wallets or trading infrastructure. We define a product as anything that has a defined consumer - that is, a human or AI user that ingests our product in order to perform a specific function. Client: A specialized program for the development, design and maintenance of cryptocurrency clients, networking clients, and other types of clients as defined by the client-server model. Due to the specialized nature of this software, this is considered a separate program to the products category.Tooling & Infrastructure: Any software or scripts for small tools and infrastructure that the public may use in collaboration or connection with products produced by the organization (either our organization, or another), but software that does not have a large enough scope to be defined as a product. An example could be a Python script that helps the general public collect and correctly categorize their cryptocurrency transactions for reporting purposes to their local tax agency, and outputs these transactions in a format to be ingested by Lukka (a third party software used in partnership with the IRS for ingestion of cryptocurrency reporting). Other (Program): Any other program that does not yet have a defined category - usually experimental. Generally, the work byproduct of these programs is not public by default, as the result may not meet our quality standards and not be fit for general public consumption in its current form.Key Accomplishments for 2022 include: Education and Awareness: We created digital avatars (2D art, character sheets, and in some cases 3D models) and a CC0-licensed t-shirt series to recognize key contributors in open-source and cryptocurrency communities, rewarding their work in non-financial, creative ways. We also continued to develop and refine the organizations brand identity and voice.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 47
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 70
  • Sustainability: 73
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 37.9%; rating input score 38
  • Program expense ratio: 76.7%; rating input score 77
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 50.6%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.02; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 2.7%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 37.9% of revenue deployed · 76.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 2 of 3 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $757K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $26K · 1 people listed
  • Consistency: 15 of 15 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 38/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 42/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 59/100.