The Stephen Tulloch Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 264752154
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2016
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2016
- Location
- Coral Gables, FL, USA
- Phone
- 3059789210
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $40,197
- Expenses
- $60,743
- Assets
- $23,348
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
2 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- STEPHEN TULLOCH (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- STEPHEN TULLOCH (PRESIDENT)
- MARCIE WIGGINS (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose of the organization is to encourage the overall development and education of disadvantaged youth through example and specific activities. The organization conducts a comprehensive outreach program to identify the needs of disadvantaged youth and how best to reach them and encourage their healthy development. The target market for the organzation is comprised primarily of youth in the detroit, Michigan and the miami, Florida metro area. The goal is to help them through example to develop healthy lifestyles, to understand the importance of education, and to encourage their overall physical and mental development.
What it reported doing in 2016
Disadvantaged youth outreach program - provided for thetransportation, food and attendance to 3 different detroitlions home games for 165 underpriviledged kids and 25adults selected from 3 different detroit city public schools based on excellent school attendance.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 70
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 28
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 80.4%; rating input score 80
- Program expense ratio: 53.2%; rating input score 53
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -51.1%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.38; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 25.3% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 11.2% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 18% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 80.4% of revenue deployed · 53.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $32K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2010 to 2016
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 53/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 25/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.