The Stem Alliance of Central Florida Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
593703119
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2022
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2022, Form 990-N 2021
Location
Orlando, FL, USA
Phone
4074815120
Rating
40
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Employment N.E.C.

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$41,484
Expenses
$143,165
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

People named in this filing

  • JEFFREY PRIDMORE (CHAIRMAN & PRES)
  • MICHELE CASALI CPA (TREASURER & SEC.)
  • DARYL HOLT (VICE CHAIR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To inspire and prepare students for stem careers and be competitive in the global economy. The stem alliance strives to accomplish this mission by facilitating the collaboration of industry, government, education and the community.

What it reported doing in 2022

Stem alliance virtual outreach - the stem alliance of central Florida is implementing a program with orange and osceola county schools to provide teachers and students with innovative, virtual stem resources in 2021. The project leverages the nepris platform to remotely connect teachers and students with local and national stem content designed to educate and inspire learners while creating meaningful connections to the local stem economy and workforce. The program provides participating schools with valuable stem resources, including:- live sessions with stem industry professionals- themed events- nepris' extensive video library- career exploration search tool- localized content provided by area stem professionals

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 10
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -245.1%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -43.1% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -11.4% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -23% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2017 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.