The Staten Island Partnership for Community Wellness Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 542132600
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2011
- Location
- Staten Island, NY, USA
- Phone
- 7182260256
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Public Health Program (Includes General Health and Wellness Promotion Services)
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,014,729
- Expenses
- $1,834,723
- Assets
- $1,363,361
- Liabilities
- $208,338
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ADRIENNE ABBATE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- ADRIENNE ABBATE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $152,945 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Staten island partnership for community wellness (sipcw) seeks to create a healthier staten island by bringing together partner organizations and community members to address pressing wellness needs and give all staten islanders a chance to live their best lives. The focus of our efforts is in communities and populations with the greatest health inequities such as bipoc and lgbtq+ identifying. For more than two decades, sipcw has addressed critical issues such as chronic disease prevention, mental health, and substance use. Through its ability to bring diverse partners to the table, sipcw has enabled data-driven decitions and identified evidence-based strategies to collectively approach complex health issues on staten island. Instead of working alone to address complex health issues, sipcw empowers organizations and individuals to use their resources together to fill serious gaps in service and treatment. Sipcw provides backbone support to several public health initiatives focusing on
What it reported doing in 2025
Sipcw, established to promote wellness and improve the health of the staten island community, especially those facing health inequities, identifies and addresses emerging and unmet health needs through collaboration and a multidisciplinary approach. The organizations programs/initiatives are as follows: 1) tackling yout substance abuse(tysa) behavioral health coalition 2) staten island childhood wellness initiative (cwi) 3) rcda heroin overdose prevention and education (hope) program 4) project rcda linking actions for umet needs in childrens health (launch) 5) dohmh birth justice defenders (bjd) 6) behavioral health prevention 7) communities together for health equity (cthe)
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 75% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 73
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 42
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 79.3%; rating input score 79
- Program expense ratio: 86.8%; rating input score 87
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 8.9%; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.74; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.15; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.3%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 8.5% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12.7% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 79.3% of revenue deployed · 86.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $153K · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 53/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 25/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 39/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 40/100.