The Stastny Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
874025849
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Las Vegas, NV, USA
Phone
2088603746
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Nutrition

Reported finances

Revenue
$8
Expenses
$17,708
Assets
$88,652
Liabilities
$3,561

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

1 person listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JORDAN STASTNY (PRESIDENT, SECRETARY, TREA)

People named in this filing

  • JORDAN STASTNY (PRESIDENT, SECRETARY, TREA)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Promote and provide education for healthier living to the underserved.

What it reported doing in 2024

Promoted and provided funds for education for healthier living to the underserved. This is done by educating underserved about the basic principles of healthy eating, food preparation, shopping, and how good nutritional health helps overall health and prevents obesity and illnesses. In addition, promotion of an active lifestyle and participation in sports is done to improve physical and mental well-being. These lifestyle changes can help the underserved also combat depression, anxiety and juvenile delinquency.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 100% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 71% for direct work, and 29% for grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 85
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 34
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 61.3%; rating input score 61

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -221,250%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.01; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 22.5% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -10.7% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -20.5% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 61.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $11K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 22/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.