The Starpoint Charitable Trust
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 137231615
- IRS 990-PF coverage
- 2010–2011
- Forms available
- Form 990-PF 2011
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 2129970600
- Rating
- 15
- Verdict
- AVOID
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Named Trusts N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $167,681
- Expenses
- $361,106
Source: IRS Form 990-PF. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Amounts in USD.
Overview
Mission
Named Trusts N.E.C.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 85% of the foundation's positive operating resources came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The foundation combined direct charitable work with grants to other organizations or people.
- Includes asset-sale income: Asset-sale income is shown separately from recurring resources when classifying the revenue model.
The verdict
AVOID - The strongest available result is that the filed numbers largely add up. The filing does not identify all grant recipients and a relatively small share of spending goes to grants.
Rating breakdown
- Grant Deployment: NotEnoughData
- Cost Efficiency: 26
- Transparency: 0
- Compliance: 50
- Endowment Health: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Grant Deployment
- Grant deployment ratio: Limited
Cost Efficiency
- Grant expense ratio: 25.9%; rating input score 26; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency
- Grant recipient disclosure: Scored; rating input score 0
Compliance
- Part VII-B activity disclosures: Limited
- Filing consistency checks: 4; rating input score 100
Endowment Health
- Endowment-health comparison: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Investments: Filed investments detail
- Consistency: 4 of 4 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2010 to 2011
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Transparency: Grant recipient disclosure scored 0/100.
- High — Cost Efficiency: Grant expense ratio scored 26/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.