The South Carolina Historical Society
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 570323800
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Charleston, SC, USA
- Phone
- 8437233225
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Historical Societies & Historic Preservation
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,635,332
- Expenses
- $2,075,948
- Assets
- $11,532,622
- Liabilities
- $54,132
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
27 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ELIZABETH CHEW (CEO AND EX-OFFICIO)
Highest reported compensation
- ELIZABETH CHEW (CEO AND EX-OFFICIO): $244,615 total reported compensation
- TARYN MASON (CHIEF DEVELOPMENT OFFICER): $148,737 total reported compensation
- VIRGINIA ELLISON (COO & DIRECTOR OF COLLECTI): $147,930 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The schs mission is to expand, preserve, and make accessible our invaluable collection, and to encourage interest and pride in the rich history of our state.
What it reported doing in 2025
Archivalthe society has approximately 3,000 manuscript collections that include letters, diaries, legal papers, and other documents dating from 1670 to the present and more than 10,000 oversized plats, monuments, maps and drawings. Over 30,000 photographs, prints, and other visual items are maintained, as well as a research library containing nearly 5,000 books selected to add contextual evidence that enhances the manuscript and other archival holdings. The collection also includes more than 45,000 historical pamphlets and printed materials as well as hundreds of files and books pertaining to genealogy. The collection also includes numerous artifacts ranging from oversized, unique battle flags to small, personal items. Most of the collection is housed at the college of charleston's addlestone library special collections area. With the museum installation in 2018 selected items are exhibited in the fireproof building. Also, some administrative records are maintained in the society's headquarters.the board of managers adopted the policy to not capitalize its collection because it is impracticable to attempt to assign values to the collection because each item has certain attributes, such as age, preparation, type of cultural material and relationship to other historical documents, persons or events in the South Carolina history that make it difficult to determine an objective basis for evaluation. The society does not consider the collections a financial asset, but rather an irreplaceable treasure of South Carolina culture to be preserved for future generations.the society's librarian and archivists operate out of addlestone library where they manage the collection, provide reference service and assist patrons in the research room. The reading room there is open monday through friday. The staff promotes the use of the collection through such activities as classroom visits, private tours of the collection, and speaking engagements to community organizations. College classes in preservation, conservation and/or frequently visit the building for hands-on experience.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 84% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 85
- Transparency & Controls: 74
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 37
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 79.4%; rating input score 79
- Fundraising efficiency: $8.94 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -26.9%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.56; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 26.1%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.3% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.8% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 79.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 24 of 24 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $1.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $245K · 27 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2011 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 31/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.