The Society of St Vincent De Paul of Omaha Nebraska
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 470745721
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2013
- Location
- Omaha, NE, USA
- Phone
- 4027798499
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $7,132,463
- Expenses
- $6,605,748
- Assets
- $3,646,665
- Liabilities
- $404,336
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JILL LYNCH-SOSA (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- KEVIN GRODE (PRESIDENT)
- CELITA MORRISON (VICE PRESIDENT)
- DIANE MEAD (VICE PRESIDENT THRU 12/2024)
Highest reported compensation
- JILL LYNCH-SOSA (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $156,391 total reported compensation
- ALI BRITT (OPERATIONS DIRECTOR): $104,545 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
A network of friends, inspired by gospel values, growing in holiness and building a more just world through personal relationships with and service to people in need.
What it reported doing in 2024
Other programs include the following: food pantry - the society st. Vincent de paul omaha's district council operates a choice food pantry that provides nutritious food and basic household items, such as diapers, to families and individuals in need. Pantry assistance is distributed based on household size, home addressand expressed need. The district council's food pantry offers perishable and non-perishable foods, including canned goods, packaged foods, fresh produce from our own garden and local suppliers, bread, dairy, frozen items and protein sources. In addition to our main pantry, several st. Vincent de paul omaha conferences operate smaller pantries, distributing food to struggling neighbors who live in their conferences' geographical "footprint".sack lunch program - each weekday, society of st. Vincent de paul omaha volunteers prepare and distribute an average of 125 free sack lunches, to homeless neighbors at the society's hfc at 1715 izard street. Each lunch is designed to be nutritious and filling, typically including a sandwich, fruit and vegetable, snack, and bottled water. For many of our neighbors, this lunch may be the only true meal they will eat on any given day.closet door clothing distribution program - each weekday, volunteers with the society of st. Vincent de paul omaha's holy family center's "closet door" distribute a wide variety of clothing and personal care items, free of charge to neighbors experiencing homelessness. Items include essentials such as socks, underwear, jeans, shirts, shoes, boots, sweatshirts and hoodies. Other clothing items are distributed "seasonally", such as shorts, sandals, coats, hats, and gloves. Theprogram also provides personal care items including sleeping bags, blankets, duffle bags/backpacks, razors, nail clippers, toothbrushes, toothpaste, soap, shampoo, lotion, lip balm, feminine hygiene products and deodorant.disaster recovery - when natural disasters strike, the society of st. Vincent de paul omaha supports local neighbors with immediate and long-term aid and relief, including financial assistance, food, clothing, furniture, household items and resource coordination. As a member of the tri-county long term recovery group a coalition of non-profits, government agencies, and volunteers ssvp omaha helps families and businesses in douglas, sarpy and Washington counties recover and build long-term resilience. Our certified disaster case managers guide survivors through the entire process, often for over a year, helping them reach a "new normal."Nebraska criminal justice review - the society of st. Vincent de paul omaha publishes the Nebraska criminal justice review a quarterly newsletter, written by volunteers to help improve communication between those who administer and staff the criminal justice system and thosewho make plans and laws for it. Circulation of the ncjr is over 1,400 quarterly, with newsletters mailed to inmates, their families, and other interested parties.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 91% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 46% for direct work, and 54% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 87
- Transparency & Controls: 75
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 47
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 86.3%; rating input score 86
- Program expense ratio: 93%; rating input score 93
- Fundraising efficiency: $37.77 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 7.4%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.55; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.11; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 19.2% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 18% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 18.1% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 86.3% of revenue deployed · 93% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $6.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $156K · 15 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 20/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 57/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 57/100.