The Society for the Study of Evolution

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
486121424
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
St Louis, MO, USA
Phone
3145779554
Rating
69
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Anthropology, Sociology

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,478,435
Expenses
$1,801,445
Assets
$6,656,303
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

19 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANNE CHARMANTIER (PRESIDENT)
  • CAROL BOGGS (PRESIDENT-ELECT)
  • KELLY ZAMUDIO (PAST PRESIDENT)
  • DR HOWARD RUNDLE (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT)
  • MARIA DEL ROSARIO CASTANEDA (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • MICHAEL WHITLOCK (VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • JASON WOLF (EDITOR-IN-CHIEF): $40,800 total reported compensation
  • DR HOWARD RUNDLE (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT): $15,000 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The society for the study of evolution promotes evolutionary biology research, education, application, outreach, and community building in an equitable and globally inclusive manner.

What it reported doing in 2024

The society grants various awards including: the stephen jay gould prize is awarded to recognize individuals whose sustained and exemplary efforts have advanced public understanding of evolutionary science and its importance in biology, education, and everyday life in the spirit of stephen jay gould. See schedule o for a continuation of all the awards.the theodosius dobzhansky prize is awarded to recognize the accomplishments and future promise of an outstanding young evolutionary biologist. The prize was established in memory of professor dobzhansky by his friends and colleagues, and reflects his lifelong commitment to fostering the research careers of young scientists. The sse presidents award recognizes an outstanding ph.d. Dissertation paper published in the journal "evolution" during a given calendar year. The w.d. Hamilton award is given to a student who has presented an outstanding talk at the annual meeting. Finalists selected to present in the hamilton symposium also receive an award. The r.c. Lewontin graduate student research excellence awards are given to assist students in the early stages of their ph.d. Programs. The rosemary grant graduate student research excellence awards are given to assist students in later stages of their ph.d. Programs.the thomas henry huxley award recognizes outreach and education achievement for early and mid-career scientists. The asn/sse/ssb inclusiveness, diversity, equity, and access (idea) award was created in 2019 by the american society of naturalists (asn), the society for the study of evolution (sse), and the society of systematic biologists (ssb). The idea award is given to a person at any career stage who has strengthened the ecology and evolutionary biology community by promoting inclusiveness and diversity in our fields. The lifetime achievement award was created to recognize individuals who have made substantial contributions to the study of evolution, who have demonstrated outstanding mentorship of trainees, and/or who have provided noteworthy service to the evolution community.other awards include small grants for outreach and education projects, support for professional development workshops and symposia, support for events at the annual meeting, and various awards for attendance at the annual meeting.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 89% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 81% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 62
  • Transparency & Controls: 70
  • Accountability: 70
  • Sustainability: 81
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 59.5%; rating input score 59
  • Program expense ratio: 87.8%; rating input score 88
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
    • Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
    • Requires narrative reports: Fail
    • Conducts field audits: Fail
    • May suspend future funding: Fail
    • Requires financial reports: Pass
    • Conducts site visits: Fail
    • Requires grant agreements: Fail
    • May require repayment: Fail
  • Grant itemization coverage: 87.1%; rating input score 87; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 89.5%; rating input score 89; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 44
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 27.3%; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.69; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 3.1%; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 10% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 10.3% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.1% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 59.5% of revenue deployed · 87.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 17 of 19 board members independent · 4 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $1.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $41K · 19 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 4 contractors listed · $771K reported
  • Consistency: 26 of 27 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes foreign activity and grants
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 9 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 7 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 59/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 6 of 8 not reported.
  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 9 not reported.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.