The Social Innovators for Americans Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 852609740
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2021
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2021
- Location
- Reston, VA, USA
- Phone
- 7038872939
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Professional Societies, Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $10,001
- Expenses
- $8,060
- Assets
- $5,100
- Liabilities
- $3,159
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
2 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Dr John Coleman III (President)
- Kim Watson (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Dr John Coleman III (President)
- Kim Watson (Vice President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The SIAA provides Community-Driven Social Innovation (CDSI) approach to improve social services to low-income communities and achieve upward social mobility. We train members in CDSI methods and techniques to become professional and certified associates that deliver our services to distressed neighborhood residents on a Pro Bono basis. Our services include community-constituent research, social design workshops, and social impact management. The desired outcome is more comprehensive community-driven improvement initiatives in high-poverty neighborhoods. Also, help low-income families in mixed-income communities overcome racial tensions, intolerance, and isolation to benefit from the opportunities in the community.
What it reported doing in 2021
We serve community-based, youth-based, and faith-based community leaders and organizations that serve Black, Indigenous, and People of Color families in low-income or high-poverty Communities. In addition, we offer our services to local, state, and federal government organizations that provide social services to distressed communities and families.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 46
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 19.4%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.63; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.62; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 180.4% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 144.2% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2020 to 2021
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 28/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 8/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.