The Sioux City Conservatory of Music
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 451544074
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2015–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Sioux City, IA, USA
- Phone
- 7125741751
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Performing Arts Schools
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $93,271
- Expenses
- $137,591
- Assets
- $305,772
- Liabilities
- $389,261
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- GIA EMORY (PRESIDENT TREASURER BOARD)
Highest reported compensation
- GIA EMORY (PRESIDENT TREASURER BOARD): $32,161 total reported compensation
- RON EMORY (MUSIC DIRECTOR BOARD MEMBE): $18,924 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To facilitate music education with a primary focus on teaching music to the youth in the community.
What it reported doing in 2025
To facilitate music education with a primary focus on teaching music to the youth in the community. Provided music lessons to students; the students performed at weekly open mic nights, semi-annual recitals, and monthly concerts.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 74% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 88
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 44
- Sustainability: 25
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 95.6%; rating input score 96
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 11
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -47.5%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.22; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.27; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 37.1%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.2% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -9.5% per year; rating input score 0; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.2% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 95.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 6 board members independent · 1 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $132K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $32K · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 18 of 18 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2015 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 7 of 8 not reported.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 26/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 39/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 3/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.