The Single Mom Kc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 820538147
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2021–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2020, Form 990-T 2025, Form 990-N 2015
- Location
- Lenexa, KS, USA
- Phone
- 9133590790
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Protestant
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $653,614
- Expenses
- $627,981
- Assets
- $266,204
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- RACHEL SEGOBIA (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- RACHEL SEGOBIA (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $72,583 total reported compensation
- CATHY MARTIN (FINANCE CHAIR): $3,800 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The single mom kc invites single moms into community, equips their families in spiritual and emotional growth and provides resources so families can walk in restoration.
What it reported doing in 2025
Boutique & emergency assistance: the clothed with dignity boutique is the only clothing closet in Kansas city that provides gently used women's clothing to single mothers at no cost. The boutique offers single mothers access to clothing, shoes, coats, undergarments, toiletries, jewelry, handbags, and self-care items, addressing both material and emotional needs. Volunteer personal shoppers create a space of belonging and assist mothers during visits, reducing feelings of isolation and fostering connection. Childcare is provided to ensure mothers can fully participate. By meeting immediate needs, the boutique restores dignity, reduces stress, and empowers mothers to focus on trauma-healing, parenting, education, and employment goals, reflecting tsmkc's values of community, hope, and radical love.. See sch "o"in 2025, the clothed with dignity boutique hosted 1705 shopping appointments and distributed over 44,000 articles of clothing.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 60% for direct work, and 40% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 75
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 40
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 79.5%; rating input score 80
- Program expense ratio: 82.6%; rating input score 83
- Fundraising efficiency: $8.31 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 98.7%; rating input score 99; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 3.9%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.42; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 12.2%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 39.2% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 22.6% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 21.3% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 79.5% of revenue deployed · 82.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $519K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $73K · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 31 of 32 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 29/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 42/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 21/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 31/100.