The Side-Out Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 202510044
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Fairfax, VA, USA
- Phone
- 8773447465
- Rating
- 68
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,478,970
- Expenses
- $1,642,957
- Assets
- $2,106,993
- Liabilities
- $401,907
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Ellen Dempsey (Executive Director)
Highest reported compensation
- Ellen Dempsey (Executive Director): $156,571 total reported compensation
- Rick Dunetz (Chief Vision Officer): $115,903 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
See Schedule O.
What it reported doing in 2024
During the 20242025 fiscal year we achieved the following research objectives.1. Publication in the British Journal of Cancer. Our manuscript, "Functional activation of the AKTmTOR signalling axis in a real-world metastatic breast cancer cohort" by Rasad D, Baldelli E, Blais EM, Davis J, El Gazzah E, Mueller C, Gomeiz A, Ibrahim A, Newrekar AV, Corgiat BA, Dunetz R, Petricoin III EF, Wei Q, and Pierobon M, was published in the British Journal of Cancer (Br J Cancer. 2024 Nov;131(9):1543-1554). This study analyzed a real-world cohort of 171 metastatic breast cancer patients who underwent multi-omic profiling through Perthera. The primary objective was to characterize metastatic lesions from a genomic perspective and compare them with historical cohorts of primary tumors, with a particular focus on how genetic alterations in the AKTmTOR pathway translate into phenotypic changes at the protein level. The findings represent an important step forward for precision medicine and demonstrate the superiority of multi-omic approaches in identifying patients who may respond to inhibitors targeting the AKT-mTOR pathway. In addition, the study further validated that increased activation of AKT downstream substrates is associated with response to CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy, consistent with observations from the Side Out 3 clinical trial (NCT03195192).2. Discovery of a novel protein-protein interaction with therapeutic relevance. We identified a previously uncharacterized protein-protein interaction that represents a new druggable axis and a potential predictor of response to CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy in metastatic breast cancer. This discovery emerged from preclinical studies conducted at George Mason University and resulted in the submission of a provisional patent application for the development of a novel diagnostic test to guide patient allocation to targeted treatments.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 96% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 76
- Transparency & Controls: 71
- Accountability: 72
- Sustainability: 29
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 84.5%; rating input score 84
- Program expense ratio: 75%; rating input score 75
- Fundraising efficiency: $9.1 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 75%; rating input score 75; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -11.1%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.28; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.19; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 16.6%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -3% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -1.7% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.4% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 84.5% of revenue deployed · 75% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 4 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $157K · 5 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $303K reported
- Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 35/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 9 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 16/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 51/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 20/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 32/100.