The Show Jumping Hall of Fame and Museum Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 222789548
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Foxboro, MA, USA
- Phone
- 5086986810
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Equestrian
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $188,519
- Expenses
- $116,114
- Assets
- $260,860
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Marty Bauman dba Classic Commnica (Executive Director)
- Robert A Ridland (President)
- Larry Langer (Vice-President)
People named in this filing
- Marty Bauman dba Classic Commnica (Executive Director)
- Peter Doubleday (Chairman)
- Robert A Ridland (President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To promote a historical and cultural awareness of the show jumping sport.
What it reported doing in 2024
Each year, the Show Jumping Hall of Fame nominates people and/or horses for possible election into the Hall of Fame. The Hall of Fame conducts an election and then holds induction ceremonies for those elected. Plaques are produced for each inductee and hung in the Hall of Fame's home at the Kentucky Horse Park.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 47
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 76
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 38.1%; rating input score 38
- Program expense ratio: 61.9%; rating input score 62
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 38.4%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.25; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 55.2%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.7% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 38.1% of revenue deployed · 61.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $72K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 38/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.