The Shepherd's Center of Chesterfield
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 542056732
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2017–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2021, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Chesterfield, VA, USA
- Phone
- 8047066689
- Rating
- 97
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Senior Centers
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $94,526
- Expenses
- $96,587
- Assets
- $283,337
- Liabilities
- $582
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- PAMELA CRANDOL (PRESIDENT)
- MARGARET EDIE (PAST PRESIDENT)
- SUSAN MCCAMMON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- KAY MAST (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- DANIEL TRUETT (TREASURER)
- PAMELA CRANDOL (PRESIDENT)
- MARGARET EDIE (PAST PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide a multipurpose comprehensive ministry for older persons sponsored and supported by religious bodies, businesses, and service organization. To also encourage people of retirement age to participate in programs of mututal interest and to render services to one another.
What it reported doing in 2024
Adventures in learning; offering 23 educational classes provided by 20 volunteers. Provides transportation to clients for appointments; volunteers donated the use of their vehicles with 89 drivers with over 32,000 miles driven. Volunteers also perform minor repairs for clients homes.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 82% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 45
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -2.2%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.93; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 46.7%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 24% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.3% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 19% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $106K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2017 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 40/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 33/100.