The Sharing Network Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
202737719
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
New Providence, NJ, USA
Phone
9085165697
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,246,640
Expenses
$1,219,687
Assets
$5,532,150
Liabilities
$68,566

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

21 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CAROLYN WELSH (PRESIDENT & CEO)
  • AMANDA A TIBOK (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • CAROLYN WELSH (PRESIDENT & CEO): $704,700 total reported compensation
  • AMANDA A TIBOK (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $210,719 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The primary purpose of the organization is to (1) support and promote the donation of organs and tissues for transplantation, therapy, research and education, (2) foster education and research with respect to human organ and tissue donation and (3) foster public service programs and the education of the public on the importance and benefits of organ and tissue donation. The organization was also formed to be an integral part of and support the tax-exempt purposes, programs and services of nj organ and tissue sharing network, inc.; an organization recognized by the IRS as tax-exempt under internal revenue code section 501 (c)(3). In connection therewith, the organization will raise funds for grants to nj organ and tissue sharing network or to operate programs that support the charitable purposes, programs and services of nj organ and tissue sharing network, based on requests of nj organ and tissue sharing network. In addition, the organization will seek out and make grants to internal r

What it reported doing in 2024

Expenses incurred in carrying out the organization's primary exempt purpose which is to (1) support and promote the donation of organs and tissues for transplantation, therapy, research and education, (2) foster education and research with respect to human organ and tissue donation and (3) foster public service programs and the education of the public on the importance and benefits of organ and tissue donation. The organization was also formed to be an integral part of and support the tax-exempt purposes, programs and services of nj organ and tissue sharing network, inc.; an organization recognized by the IRS as tax-exempt under internal revenue code section 501 (c)(3). In connection therewith, the organization will raise funds for grants to nj organ and tissue sharing network or to operate programs that support the charitable purposes, programs and services of nj organ and tissue sharing network, based on requests of nj organ and tissue sharing network. In addition, the organization will seek out and make grants to internal revenue code section 501 (c)(3) and governmental organizations that support and promote organ and tissue donation in the state of New Jersey. These grants are intended to reward those organizations that are creating or operating programs that best promote and support successful organ and tissue donation efforts and to indirectly provide those organizations with public acknowledgment of their efforts and success. Finally, the organization will also consider grants to local groups who support organ and tissue donation.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 73% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 58% for direct work, and 42% for grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 69
  • Transparency & Controls: 78
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 55
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 72.5%; rating input score 73
  • Program expense ratio: 71%; rating input score 71
  • Fundraising efficiency: $10.86 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 98.6%; rating input score 99; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 2.2%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.54; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 12.6%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 4.2% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 16.6% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 72.5% of revenue deployed · 71% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $867K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $705K · 21 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 23 of 24 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 6 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 41/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 42/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 29/100.