The Shane Edward Tanzosh Arvc Heart Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
821142471
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
N Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
Phone
2016509707
Rating
37
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Medical Disciplines Research

Reported finances

Revenue
$50
Expenses
$1,156
Assets
$17,835
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • FELICIA TANZOSH (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • FELICIA TANZOSH (PRESIDENT)
  • ANTHONY TANZOSH (TRUSTEE)
  • ASHLEY TANZOSH (TRUSTEE)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose is to provide funding for medical research for the medical condition known as arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (arvc), for education of the public, as well as individuals and families effected by arvc, for the emotional, physical and psychological support of individuals and families effected by arvc, for support of the medical community for early diagnosis, treatement and cure of individuals with arvc and fora any and all other aspects of assistance, medical or personal, for all individuals effected by arvc.

What it reported doing in 2024

Funding of medical research for the medical condition known as arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (arvc).

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 43
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -2,212%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 15.43; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 31.5% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -40.5% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -2.5% per year; rating input score 0; 30th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2017 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.