The Savila Collaborative
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 460667855
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Albuquerque, NM, USA
- Phone
- 5053127296
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Mental Health Treatment F31 Psychiatric, Mental Health Hospital
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,090,025
- Expenses
- $3,134,852
- Assets
- $1,109,765
- Liabilities
- $406,746
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- WILLIAM WAGNER (EXECUTIVE DI): $130,811 total reported compensation
- GUIOVANNA AGUIRRE (DEPUTY DIREC): $116,102 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The svila collaborative dba centro savila is a treatment program devoted to the recovery and healing of individuals, families, and communities experiencing emotional and psychological distress. Our vision is to create a healthy, engaged, and equitable community. Our mission is to improve the mental health of our community by ensuring access to linguistically and culturally relevant, quality mental health and prevention services, education and healthcare professional development.
What it reported doing in 2024
Clinical services: centro svila provides outpatient mental health and substance use services, including screening, assessment, evaluation, and psychotherapy, regardless of a client's ability to pay. Intake specialists conduct comprehensive assessments and connect individuals to clinical and case management services. In fy25, centro svila served 880 clients, including many newly enrolled individuals with complex behavioral health needs. The organization delivered a total of 6,866 appointments and 7,499 direct service hours, reflecting a significant level of engagement and access to care. During this time, centro svila provided 434 crisis intervention and suicide prevention sessions, followed by 346 additional follow-up appointments to ensure continuity of care and client stabilization. Clinical services included individual, family, couples, and group therapy, as well as crisis intervention, suicide prevention, and trauma-informed mental health evaluations. In addition, centro svila facilitated culturally responsive support groups, delivering 429 group sessions and engaging nearly 100 participants in group-based services designed to promote healing, connection, and resilience. These services are delivered through a hybrid model (in-person and telehealth) across multiple sites, improving accessibility and continuity of care.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 75% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 83
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 24
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 86.6%; rating input score 87
- Program expense ratio: 85.3%; rating input score 85
- Fundraising efficiency: $21.76 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1.5%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.35; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.37; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7.9%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 18.4% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 16.7% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 21.1% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 86.6% of revenue deployed · 85.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $2.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $131K · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 28/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 11/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 29/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 37/100.