The San Francisco Particular Council of the Society of St Vincent De Paul
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 941571017
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- San Francisco, CA, USA
- Phone
- 4159771270
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $21,877,815
- Expenses
- $22,492,871
- Assets
- $11,604,221
- Liabilities
- $4,227,856
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
22 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOE STARK (PRESIDENT)
- BELINDA VEGA (VICE PRESIDENT)
- PATRICK SCHMALZ (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
Highest reported compensation
- PATRICK SCHMALZ (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $202,438 total reported compensation
- ESTELLA M BALAURO (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $148,211 total reported compensation
- SALVADOR LOPEZ BARR (CHIEF HOMELESS SERVICES OFFICER): $139,326 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the st. Vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.
What it reported doing in 2024
Domestic violence services: the riley center and the st. Vincent de paul society of san francisco offer an array of services aimed at supporting survivors of domestic violence and gender-based violence. These services are grounded in a housing first approach, prioritizing safety, stability, and empowerment, offering services that help survivors rebuild their lives and achieve long-term security. The riley center serves a diverse population of survivors, ensuring its services are culturally competent, trauma-informed, and multilingual to meet the unique needs of individuals from various backgrounds.the riley center offers safe and confidential services for any survivor of an abusive relationship and their children through rosalie house, brennan house, and the community office.rosalie house is an emergency shelter in san francisco for survivors of gender-based violence both with and without children. Rosalie house provides a 24-hour crisis line, up to twelve weeks in a 23-bed emergency shelter, food, clothing, peer counseling, support groups, advocacy, case management, mental health services, and children's services.brennan house offers transitional housing in san francisco for survivors of gender-based violence, both with and without children. Brennan house provides up to 12 months of transitional housing, as well as the support services listed above for up to 32 clients and children for families that need more time to stabilize. The goal is to both remove barriers to housing and to secure available housing for these clients.the riley center community office provides follow-up counseling, case management, support groups and advocacy for survivors who are striving to maintain stability and self-sufficiency after having experienced domestic violence. The community office also provides information and referrals to other community agencies to ensure that the survivors we serve have access to comprehensive services. Other functions of the community office include community outreach and coordination of volunteer activities. Community office is an official access point for survivors to obtain a coordinated entry assessment. The community office is also a drop-in center for resources and services directly serving survivors of domestic violence.community office adheres to trauma-informed, client-centered, and housing first principles, ensuring low-barrier access to services. It operates with harm reduction principles and complies with privacy and confidentiality standards under federal and state laws. Services are delivered at designated access points, with bilingual support and interpretation services available as needed. The program also facilities feedback through surveys, tracks data on service effectiveness, and supports survivors in becoming document-ready for housing opportunities.the riley center domestic violence coordinated entry program, provides a comprehensive range of services to support individuals and families experiencing homelessness because of domestic violence, sexual assault, stalking, or human trafficking. The program connects survivors to resources and services aimed at ensuring their safety and housing stability. This includes outreach, problem-solving conversations, housing assessments, prioritization for housing and shelter, and referrals to the homelessness response system for temporary and permanent housing solutions.st. Vincent de paul society was awarded two emergency housing voucher (ehv) contracts through the department of homelessness and supportive housing (hsh) for programs funded by u.s. Department of housing and urban department (hud) to both provide housing navigation to and make housing placements for survivors of domestic violence specifically. These hud ehv dollars for domestic violence extend to december 2025.community office is also home to the uav dv program, which is funded by hsh. The urgent accommodation voucher (uav) program is designed to provide emergency short-term hotel stays and suppo
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 92% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 92% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 85
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 26
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 87.7%; rating input score 88
- Program expense ratio: 85.2%; rating input score 85
- Fundraising efficiency: $31.54 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -2.8%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.52; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.36; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.5%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10.5% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.1% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.2% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 87.7% of revenue deployed · 85.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $19.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $202K · 22 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $1.5M reported
- Consistency: 39 of 39 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 21/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 40/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 55/100.