The Salvation Army World Service Office
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 132923701
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Alexandria, VA, USA
- Phone
- 7036845534
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- International Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $19,917,891
- Expenses
- $21,137,446
- Assets
- $74,429,394
- Liabilities
- $1,026,604
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KENNETH HODDER (PRESIDENT - UNTIL 02/28/2025)
- MERLE HEATWOLE (PRESIDENT - FROM 03/01/2025)
- JAMES BETTS (VICE PRESIDENT)
- JOHN BRACKENBURY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- BRAM BAILEY (ASSISTANT NATIONAL SECETARY): $197,004 total reported compensation
- ELLEN FARNHAM (CONTROLLER): $190,967 total reported compensation
- JUSTIN BOSWELL (DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS): $179,117 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To support and strengthen the salvation army's efforts to work hand in hand with communities to improve the health, economic, and spiritual conditions of the poor throughout the world.
What it reported doing in 2024
Anti-human trafficking: recent estimates place the number of people in situations of modern slavery/human trafficking at approximately 65 million people. This includes forced labor, commercial sexual exploitation, forced marriage, and other forms of exploitation for profit. Trafficking in persons, commonly called human trafficking, is the fastest growing criminal enterprise globally worth at least $236 billion per annum. The acceleration of 'stealing people's freedom for profit' is driven by a number of adverse factors, including humanitarian crises, environmental degradation and the impact of changing climate, and other economic and social distress, especially for vulnerable and marginalized communities.the salvation army world service office responds to these needs through projects focused on direct services to people with lived experience of modern slavery/human trafficking1, safeguarding children without an effective guardian, prevention efforts to address root causes, and mobilizing people to recognize and know how to respond to threats of trafficking in their communities.in india, the salvation army also provides direct support to women and children within one of the largest red-light districts in mumbai, india. With more than 2,000 women and over 500 children living in the red-light district and vulnerable to exploitation and abuse, the salvation army runs a safe drop-in center where children can access educational and spiritual support, health support, healthy and nutritious food, and life skills toward long-term safety. Women are provided skills training, literacy training, income generating activities, and emotional support for safe livelihood alternatives and holistic care and support to safe futures. There is also a children's home which provides safe accommodation for children who otherwise would be without adult supervision outside and at night, while their mothers worked in the red-light district. This is seen as important protection in the immediate term and also an important preventive measure to intervene in the trajectory that could otherwise lead the children to also working in the red-light district.in indonesia, the salvation army is operating a project which works with salvation army children's homes to expand the options for child protection and child safeguarding.2 through partnership with local organizations, the salvation army is working to find family-based care, including kinship and foster care or family reunification where that is possible, safe, and in the best interests of the child. The salvation army continues to provide residential care for those who continue to need that level of support. Working with the children, whether in family-based care or in the children's home, continues to focus on their long-term emotional and physical care.in greece, the salvation army is providing holistic case management, counselling, referrals to services, and practical support for people who have needed to rely on sex for survival, including people who have been trafficked. The salvation army team there are also working intensively to strengthen the ecosystem to respond effectively to human trafficking through building partnerships and advocating for protective policies on a wider scale.the magnitude of modern slavery/human trafficking globally necessitates a coordinated and comprehensive response. Sawso supports modern slavery/human trafficking response(mshtr) zonal response projects in the south asia zone and the south pacific and east asia zone. These mshtr zonal response projects are strategic investments in the continued awareness raising and building the internal capacity of the salvation army to mobilize and address human trafficking on a larger scope and with coordination within the geographic zones. These projects have seen the salvation army across the globe become increasing equipped to respond to human trafficking within their communities.the mshtr zonal response projects leverage the strengths o
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 42% for direct work, and 58% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 95
- Transparency & Controls: 69
- Accountability: 92
- Sustainability: 47
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 93%; rating input score 93
- Fundraising efficiency: $40.75 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Pass
- Conducts field audits: Limited
- May suspend future funding: Limited
- Requires financial reports: Limited
- Conducts site visits: Pass
- Requires grant agreements: Limited
- May require repayment: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 99.9%; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -6.1%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.52; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.7% per year; rating input score 100; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -2.2% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.8% per year; rating input score 100; 21st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 93% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 7 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 7 filed program accomplishments · $19.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $197K · 15 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 15/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.