The Rush Center Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
582271500
IRS 990 coverage
2014–2020
Forms available
Form 990 2020
Location
Atlanta, GA, USA
Phone
4046882524
Rating
73
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Patient Services - Entertainment, Recreation

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$98,300
Expenses
$227,145
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

People named in this filing

  • ALEXANDER HOKE (Chairman)
  • ALYSSA GREENE (Director)
  • LEANNE RUBENSTEIN (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Rush Center strives to strengthen Georgia's lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer community through education, advocacy, development of safe gathering spaces and collaborative efforts with progressive organizations.

What it reported doing in 2020

Up until its closing on June 15, 2020 as a result of the impact of the Corona Virus pandemic, The Rush Center, Inc. (formerly The Health Initiative, Inc.) operated the following programs:1. Education, Advocacy, Support, and Access to Care(i) Education-To the extent possible in light of the pandemic, The Rush Center, Inc. (formerly The Health Initiative, Inc.) had an educational and outreach presence at major events held in Atlanta area that drew LGBT individuals from throughout the southeast. This included educational information on a wide variety of health issues, including health screening resources and referrals which were provided through: Periodic educational workshops and health and wellness and information regarding the Affordable Care Act.Media campaigns in conjunction with major events in Georgias LGBT community.Semi-monthly e-newsletters distributed to approximately 3000 individualsA website which included a LGBT Friendly Physician List for a variety of medical specialties-The Rush Center, Inc. (formerly The Health Initiative, Inc.) also provided education and training on LGBT health needs and culturally competent care to health care providers in several Georgia cities. These included: Trainings and consultations to address such issues as language used on intake forms and interviews, nondiscrimination statements, display of LGBT-inclusive literature, and legal protections of particular interest to LGBT individuals (wills, powers of attorney, etc.)(ii) Advocacy-Through Advocacy, The Rush Center, Inc. (formerly The Health Initiative, Inc.) worked directly with: Organizations such as Fulton County Smoke Free Coalition, the National Coalition for LGBT Health, Georgians for a Healthy Future and Georgia Equality on legislative advocacy on behalf of the LGBT community.Individuals to increase knowledge of the relevant issues and empower them to advocate for themselvesThe Rush Center, Inc. (formerly The Health Initiative, Inc.) web site as a networking and outreach tool offering resource contacts, collaborations and direct service contact.(iii) Support- The Rush Center, Inc. (formerly The Health Initiative, Inc.) served, at no cost, members of Georgias LGBT community, along with their partners and family members who also may have requested assistance. These services included: Referrals to low-cost healthcare providers, such as Family Health Centers of GA, Grady Healthcare, The Center for Black Womens Wellness, AbsoluteCARE, and Piedmont Ave. Health & Wellness to provide low cost screenings and healthcare for uninsured/under insured members of Atlantas LGBT community. The Rush Center, Inc. (formerly The Health Initiative, Inc.) covered the cost of these screenings and care through its Community Health Fund, supported by individuals and community organizationsRush Center on-site library and links to information resources through The Rush Center, Inc. (formerly The Health Initiative, Inc.)s websiteReferrals to complementary agencies that help with meals, housing, and expenses (iv) Access to CareThe Rush Center, Inc. (formerly The Health Initiative, Inc.) served as a sub-grantee of Positive Impact Health Centers (PIHC) for work related to the Affordable Care Act (ACA), through the Ryan White Part A federal program. The Rush Center, Inc. (formerly The Health Initiative, Inc.) did not hold the master agreement with the government. The Rush Center, Inc. (formerly The Health Initiative, Inc.)s agreement was with PIHC.In connection with this grant, The Rush Center, Inc. (formerly The Health Initiative, Inc.) offered navigation services for the Health Insurance Marketplace. This involved answering general questions about the ACA and helping individuals understand and submit their applications for coverage. Navigators did not fill out the forms for individuals or collect any personal information on the individuals; they simply provided assistance. Navigators did not suggest what insurance plan the individual should purchase but answered

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 86% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 75
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 76
  • Sustainability: 16
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 88.4%; rating input score 88
  • Program expense ratio: 76.9%; rating input score 77
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -131.1%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -2.5% per year; rating input score 0; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -5.9% per year; rating input score 0; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -15.6% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 88.4% of revenue deployed · 76.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $175K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 22 of 22 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2014 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 18/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.