The Royal Airs Nfp
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 364439178
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2016–2017
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2017, Form 990-N 2014
- Location
- East Dundee, IL, USA
- Phone
- 8479973290
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Performing Arts Schools
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,391
- Expenses
- $2,587
- Assets
- $3,637
- Liabilities
- $4,000
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SCOTT JAMESON (President)
People named in this filing
- SCOTT JAMESON (President)
- PATTY STANCLIFF (Secretary)
- RHONDA SCHOCK (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The royal airs, nfp is a non-profit educational organization created to provide a positive learning experience, a positive performance experience, as well as the promotion of the performing arts. It provides educational and instructional training and information, entertainment, and/or performance experience to any individual member for the purpose of improving or developing his or her interest in music and the performing arts through a drum and bugle corps venue, and/or other performing arts activities. It conducts activities beneficial to the individual to the individuals and community inclusive of but not limited to music education, musical entertainment, and physical activity for it's participants. In essence, it provides educational and performance opportunities for the participants through the performing arts.
What it reported doing in 2017
Awarded one(1) $500 scholarships to one member of a junior drum & bugle corps to enable them to compete for the 2007 season.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 39
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -8.2%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.41; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.1; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -90.3% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -52.9% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2016 to 2017
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 31/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 57/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 6/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.