The Roots Initiative

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
320659999
IRS 990 coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2021
Location
Chicago, IL, USA
Phone
7737879050
Rating
68
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Youth Development Programs

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$166,488
Expenses
$199,159
Assets
$215,071
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • TANESHA PEEPLES (CEO)
  • ROBBIE CURRY (PRESIDENT)
  • NIKKI WILLIAMS (VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • TANESHA PEEPLES (CEO): $67,223 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To nbsp; activate nbsp; black nbsp; youth nbsp; as nbsp; the nbsp; architects nbsp; and nbsp; leaders nbsp; of nbsp; transformative nbsp; civic nbsp; and nbsp; social nbsp; change nbsp; in nbsp; their nbsp; communities nbsp; and nbsp; beyond nbsp; we nbsp; beleive nbsp; tht nbsp; when nbsp; youth nbsp; are nbsp; provided nbsp; the nbsp; social-emotional nbsp; supports nbsp; education nbsp; and nbsp; resources nbsp; to nbsp; understand nbsp; their nbsp; power nbsp; identity nbsp; culture nbsp; and nbsp; inherent nbsp; genius nbsp; then nbsp; they nbsp; will nbsp; have nbsp; a nbsp; greater nbsp; sense nbsp; of nbsp; responsibility nbsp; as nbsp; well nbsp; as nbsp; confidence nbsp; and nbsp; knowledge nbsp; to nbsp; engage nbsp; civically nbsp; resulting nbsp; in nbsp; positive nbsp; economic nbsp; civic nbsp; and nbsp; social nbsp; change nbsp; in nbsp; their nbsp; communities nbsp; and nbsp; city

What it reported doing in 2024

We immerse black middle school youth in dynamic leadership development through our year-round programming. We host hands-on workshops and engaging community projects our programs cultivate essential skills foster strong connections and empower young leaders to drive impactful social change.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 50
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 84
  • Sustainability: 30
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 56.4%; rating input score 56
  • Program expense ratio: 47.1%; rating input score 47
  • Fundraising efficiency: $6.24 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -19.6%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.08; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 33.8%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 84.2% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -40.4% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -9.9% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 56.4% of revenue deployed · 47.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $94K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $67K · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 22 of 22 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 56/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 47/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 27/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 14/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 43/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 9/100.