The Roger Baldwin Foundation of Aclu Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
362682569
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Chicago, IL, USA
Phone
3122019740
Rating
74
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$7,993,015
Expenses
$5,772,021
Assets
$20,402,356
Liabilities
$2,993,609

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

40 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JILL M METZ (PRESIDENT)
  • COLLEEN CONNELL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • COLLEEN CONNELL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $373,650 total reported compensation
  • KT SULLIVAN (ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR): $301,848 total reported compensation
  • ED YOHNKA (DIRECTOR OF COMMUNICATIONS AND PUBLIC POLICY): $290,392 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To facilitate increased understanding and protection of civil liberties and rights through public education and by providing legal advice and legal representation of clients for the purpose of advancing civil liberties.

What it reported doing in 2024

Justice program: corrections reform project - the project continues to work to improve health care for all persons in Illinois prisons. The state continues to lag in implementing a plan to make changes, as noted in reports from court appointed experts. We also are pursuing a lawsuit challenging conditions at the mary davis home, a facility designed to hold youth in detention prior to trial or further adjudication. The home, located in galesburg, has failed to meet constitutional standards, including through improper use of solitary confinement. Police practices project -the project continues to focus this year on implementing a consent decree between the city of chicago and the Illinois attorney generals office aimed at improving policing across the city. Our clients and partners have provided valuable input from their members, bringing diverse perspectives and life experiences from all across the city of chicago. The project has spoken out against proposed policies that fail to address input from the public, and those that fall short of the meaningful reform sought by chicago residents and promised under the decree. The project also continues a separate lawsuit against the chicago police on behalf of several chicago residents who have been subjected to repeated, unnecessary traffic stops. The traffic stops are part of a massive traffic stop program by the police department targeting black and latino drivers in chicago that are alleged to enhance safety, but data show no such positive impact.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 91% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 62
  • Transparency & Controls: 70
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 68
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 56.1%; rating input score 56
  • Program expense ratio: 74.5%; rating input score 74
  • Fundraising efficiency: $16.21 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 27.8%; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.53; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.15; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 55.2%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3.2% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.3% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 11.7% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 56.1% of revenue deployed · 74.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 21 of 21 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $4.3M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $374K · 40 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $250K reported
  • Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 18 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 56/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 53/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 51/100.